Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury
- PMID: 14970018
- PMCID: PMC7974622
Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury
Abstract
Background and purpose: Diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging is a means to characterize and differentiate morphologic features, including edema, necrosis, and tumor tissue, by measuring differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We hypothesized that DW imaging has the potential to differentiate recurrent or progressive tumor growth from treatment-induced damage to brain parenchyma in high-grade gliomas after radiation therapy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed follow-up conventional and DW MR images obtained starting 1 month after completion of radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy for histologically proved high-grade gliomas. Eighteen patients with areas of abnormal enhancing tissue were identified. ADC maps were calculated from echo-planar DW images, and mean ADC values and ADC ratios (ADC of enhancing lesion to ADC of contralateral white matter) were compared with final diagnosis. Recurrence was established by histologic examination or by clinical course and a combination of imaging studies.
Results: Recurrence and nonrecurrence could be differentiated by using mean ADC values and ADC ratios. ADC ratios in the recurrence group showed significantly lower values (mean +/- SD, 1.43 +/- 0.11) than those of the nonrecurrence group (1.82 +/- 0.07, P <.001). Mean ADCs of the recurrent tumors (mean +/- SD, 1.18 +/- 0.13 x 10(-3) mm/s(2)) were significantly lower than those of the nonrecurrence group (1.40 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm/s(2), P <.006).
Conclusion: Assessment of ADC ratios of enhancing regions in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas is useful in differentiating radiation effects from tumor recurrence or progression.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions.Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(9):1131-42. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Sep 18. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006. PMID: 17071335
-
Distinction between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007. PMID: 17289287
-
Application value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of brain radiation-injuries and glioma recurrence.Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2012 Aug;34(4):396-400. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2012.04.016. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2012. PMID: 22954125
-
Treatment-related change versus tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: a diagnostic conundrum--use of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan;198(1):19-26. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7417. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012. PMID: 22194475 Review.
-
Diffusion-weighted MR of the brain: methodology and clinical application.Radiol Med. 2005 Mar;109(3):155-97. Radiol Med. 2005. PMID: 15775887 Review. English, Italian.
Cited by
-
Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty.J Neurooncol. 2024 Feb;166(3):535-546. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04578-6. Epub 2024 Feb 5. J Neurooncol. 2024. PMID: 38316705 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):165-179. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy461. Neurosurgery. 2019. PMID: 30535032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix.Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan;15(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4. Epub 2004 Nov 5. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15538578
-
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment of Radionecrosis in Malignant Gliomas and Cerebral Metastases.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;14(24):6264. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246264. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36551750 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conventional MRI Criteria to Differentiate Progressive Disease From Treatment-Induced Effects in High-Grade (WHO Grade 3-4) Gliomas.Neurology. 2022 Jul 5;99(1):e77-e88. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200359. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Neurology. 2022. PMID: 35437259 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Samnick S, Bader JB, Hellwig D, et al. Clinical value of iodine-123-alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine single-photon emission tomography in the differential diagnosis of recurrent brain tumor in patients pretreated for glioma at follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:396–404 - PubMed
-
- Langleben DD, Segall GM. PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1861–1867 - PubMed
-
- Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Henze M, et al. Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroradiology 2002;44:216–222 - PubMed
-
- Kumar AJ, Leeds NE, Fuller GN, et al. Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. Radiology 2000;217:377–384 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical