Physical characteristics that predict functional performance in Division I college football players
- PMID: 14971973
- DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)018<0115:pctpfp>2.0.co;2
Physical characteristics that predict functional performance in Division I college football players
Abstract
Strength and conditioning professionals who work with collegiate football players focus much of their time and effort on developing programs to enhance athletic performance. Although there has been much speculation, there is little scientific evidence to suggest which combination of physical characteristics best predicts athletic performance in this population. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relationship among 6 physical characteristics and 3 functional measures in college football players. Data were gathered on 46 NCAA Division I college football players. The 3 response variables were 36.6-m sprint, 18.3-m shuttle run, and vertical jump. The 6 regressor variables were height, weight, percentage of body fat, hamstring length, bench press, and hang clean. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to screen for variables that predict physical performance. Regression analysis revealed clear prediction models for the 36.6-m sprint and 18.3-m shuttle run. The results of this investigation will help strength and conditioning specialists better understand the variables that predict athletic performance in Division I college football players.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between core stability and performance in division I football players.J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1750-4. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874564. J Strength Cond Res. 2008. PMID: 18978631 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of training history, player position, and body composition on exercise performance in collegiate football players.J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Feb;16(1):44-9. J Strength Cond Res. 2002. PMID: 11834106
-
Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players.J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d682fa. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. PMID: 20453681
-
Combine performance descriptors and predictors of recruit ranking for the top high school football recruits from 2001 to 2009: differences between position groups.J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1193-203. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318215f546. J Strength Cond Res. 2011. PMID: 21478765
-
Science of rugby league football: a review.J Sports Sci. 2005 Sep;23(9):961-76. doi: 10.1080/02640410400023381. J Sports Sci. 2005. PMID: 16195048 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Resistance Training on Change-of-Direction Speed in Youth and Young Physically Active and Athletic Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2020 Aug;50(8):1483-1499. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01293-w. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32451922 Free PMC article.
-
Association between the attentional network efficiency and change of direction speed ability in young male Indian footballers.Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jan 29;7:1529252. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1529252. eCollection 2025. Front Sports Act Living. 2025. PMID: 39944152 Free PMC article.
-
Fat-Free Mass Index in NCAA Division I and II Collegiate American Football Players.J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2719-2727. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001737. J Strength Cond Res. 2017. PMID: 27930454 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship between Performance and Trunk Movement During Change of Direction.J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Mar 1;10(1):112-8. eCollection 2011. J Sports Sci Med. 2011. PMID: 24149303 Free PMC article.
-
What performance characteristics determine elite versus nonelite athletes in the same sport?Sports Health. 2013 Nov;5(6):542-7. doi: 10.1177/1941738113479763. Sports Health. 2013. PMID: 24427430 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources