Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Feb;63(2):235-9; discussion 239-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.081.

Tumor-size breakpoint for prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Tumor-size breakpoint for prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma

Vincenzo Ficarra et al. Urology. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify an optimal tumor-size breakpoint to distinguish between two groups with different prognoses in a large cohort of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 813 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for localized RCC from 1976 to 2000. The optimal breakpoint for the pathologic size was calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 5.5 cm as the optimal breakpoint to predict cancer-specific survival rates. The pathologic size was 5.5 cm or less in 565 neoplasms (69.5%) and more than 5.5 cm in 248 (30.5%). In the multivariate analysis, the more predictive model included the 5.5-cm-or-less pathologic size breakpoint. The pathologic size of 7 cm or less was not an independent variable in this cohort of patients.

Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with localized RCC, 5.5 cm was the optimal breakpoint to classify patients with localized RCC into two subgroups with different prognoses; the 7-cm-or-less cutoff value was not an independent variable. The data obtained by analyzing a large cohort of consecutive patients should be validated by other large series with the prospective of redefining the TNM staging system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources