Position for women during second stage of labour
- PMID: 14973980
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2
Position for women during second stage of labour
Update in
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5:CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. PMID: 22592681 Updated.
Abstract
Background: For centuries, there has been controversy around whether being upright (sitting, birthing stools, chairs, squatting) or lying down have advantages for women delivering their babies.
Objectives: To assess the benefits and risks of the use of different positions during the second stage of labour (i.e. from full dilatation of the cervix).
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (16 April 2003).
Selection criteria: Trials that used randomised or quasi-randomised allocation and appropriate follow up and compared various positions assumed by pregnant women during the second stage of labour.
Data collection and analysis: We independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data.
Main results: Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 19 included trials (5764 participants) was variable. Use of any upright or lateral position, compared with supine or lithotomy positions, was associated with: reduced duration of second stage of labour (10 trials: mean 4.29 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95 to 5.64 minutes) - this was largely due to a considerable reduction in women allocated to the use of the birth cushion; a small reduction in assisted deliveries (18 trials: relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98); a reduction in episiotomies (12 trials: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91); an increase in second degree perineal tears (11 trials: RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.39); increased estimated blood loss greater than 500 ml (11 trials: RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.15); reduced reporting of severe pain during second stage of labour (1 trial: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.90); fewer abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (1 trial: RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.98).
Reviewer's conclusions: The tentative findings of this review suggest several possible benefits for upright posture, with the possibility of increased risk of blood loss greater than 500 ml. Women should be encouraged to give birth in the position they find most comfortable. Until such time as the benefits and risks of various delivery positions are estimated with greater certainty, when methodologically stringent trials' data are available, women should be allowed to make informed choices about the birth positions in which they might wish to assume for delivery of their babies.
Update of
-
Woman's position during second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2. PMID: 10796279 Updated.
Similar articles
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28539008 Free PMC article.
-
Woman's position during second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2. PMID: 10796279 Updated.
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5:CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. PMID: 22592681 Updated.
-
Immersion in water during labour and birth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29768662 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Complementary therapies for labour and birth study: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal integrative medicine for pain management in labour.BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010691. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27406639 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The AEDUCATE Collaboration. Comprehensive antenatal education birth preparation programmes to reduce the rates of caesarean section in nulliparous women. Protocol for an individual participant data prospective meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;10(9):e037175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037175. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32967876 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-informed obstetric practice during normal birth in China: trends and influences in four hospitals.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Mar 8;6:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-29. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16524472 Free PMC article.
-
The road to health care.BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.1. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15231586 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28539008 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous