Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: simple concept but potentially sublime scientific value
- PMID: 14976442
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: simple concept but potentially sublime scientific value
Abstract
This review discusses the available scientific evidence of the physiological changes and clinical outcomes with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is more technically demanding, and its prognostic advantage has not been clearly elucidated. This paper examines the evolution of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and the technical challenges of 'bypassing' the cardiopulmonary bypass machine. A search of the Medline database of English-language literature yielded a huge number of articles from which those relating to physiological and biochemical changes, and clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting were selected for this review. There are few prospective randomized trials, mostly studying physiological and biochemical changes, and assessing specific clinical outcomes. Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass results in a significantly reduced systemic inflammatory response. Myocardial, renal and neurological functions, amongst others, are better preserved. A rapid advance in beating heart surgery technology occurred in the past 5 yrs enabling off-pump multivessel coronary bypass grafting to be performed with relative technical ease, thereby offsetting the propensity to incomplete revascularization which can be a major setback. The clinical outcome of patients with varying surgical risks who have off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting are comparable to those who have surgical revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass. With the technical challenges of off-pump coronary bypass grafting surmounted, the simple concept of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass can yield impressive results that would help to establish the routine use of this technique for myocardial revascularization.
Similar articles
-
Beating heart revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: evaluation of inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jun;127(6):1624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.043. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15173716 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized study to evaluate stress response during beating-heart and conventional coronary revascularization.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):506-12; discussion 506-12. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01360-2. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276508 Clinical Trial.
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting: are risk models developed from on-pump surgery valid for off-pump surgery?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.018. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 14752428
-
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Aug;89(4):913-22, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.06.015. Surg Clin North Am. 2009. PMID: 19782844 Review.
-
Technology insight: randomized trials of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005 May;2(5):261-8. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0190. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16265510 Review.
Cited by
-
Epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, controlled study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2011 Sep 18;11:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-11-17. BMC Anesthesiol. 2011. PMID: 21923942 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment strategies in severe symptomatic carotid and coronary artery disease.Med Sci Monit. 2011 Aug;17(8):RA191-197. doi: 10.12659/msm.881896. Med Sci Monit. 2011. PMID: 21804476 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous