A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials
- PMID: 14977307
- DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00010
A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root canal filling material by comparing its apical sealing ability with that of laterally condensed gutta-percha with sealer and high-temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha with sealer in extracted bovine teeth. Sixty bovine incisors with single canals were prepared in a standard manner using LightSpeed instruments, randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth, and obturated. The sealing ability of each technique was assessed by immersion in 1% methylene blue dye for 3 days. The teeth were cleared, and the linear extent of dye penetration was measured with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn's test. Canals filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha or thermoplasticized gutta-percha showed significantly less apical dye penetration than canals obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in leakage between the laterally condensed group and the thermoplasticized group. The results suggest that gutta-percha obturation may provide an apical seal that is superior to MTA.
Comment in
-
A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials.J Endod. 2004 Dec;30(12):826; author reply 826. J Endod. 2004. PMID: 15564859 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
