Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar;89(2):F149-51.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.024034.

Prevalence of hypospadias and other genital anomalies among singleton births, 1988-1997, in Scotland

Affiliations

Prevalence of hypospadias and other genital anomalies among singleton births, 1988-1997, in Scotland

S F Ahmed et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Considerable debate exists on the epidemiology of genital anomalies.

Methods: All genital anomalies, excluding undescended testes, were identified from neonatal returns, stillbirth and infant death survey records, and returns relating to hospital admissions and linked to form infant profiles on a cohort of singleton births between 1988 and 1997 with follow up for a minimum of three years.

Findings: The mean genital anomaly prevalence rate in Scotland was calculated at 4.6 per 1000 births varying from 4.0 per 1000 births in 1988 to 5.9 per 1000 births in 1996. However, there was no evidence of a clear trend to an increasing prevalence of hypospadias, which constituted 73% of the anomalies studied. Logistic regression analysis of the data also showed this rate to be independently associated with being relatively small for gestational age (odds ratio (OR) 1.43, p < 0.001) and increasing maternal age (OR 1.2, p < 0.05). Infants born in deprived areas, as judged by the Carstairs deprivation score, were least likely to have a genital anomaly (OR 0.73, p < 0.01).

Interpretation: A new linked register of congenital genital anomalies in Scotland suggests that over a decade, the birth prevalence of genital anomalies has changed little. The associations between genital anomalies, maternal age, and socioeconomic deprivation require further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence rates (per 1000 births) for all genital anomalies and hypospadias between 1988 and 1997. Error bars denote 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence rates (per 1000 births) between 1988 and 1997 for all genital anomalies and hypospadias in the 15 health boards of Scotland. The health boards on the left are located on the western side of Scotland and those on the right are located on the eastern side. Error bars denote 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Dis Child. 2000 May;82(5):349-52 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2001 Mar;165(3):934-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002 Jan;56(1):1-18 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2002 Mar;109(3):473-8 - PubMed
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1986;324:1-52 - PubMed

Publication types