Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jul-Sep;24(3):124-8.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients on ventilator

Affiliations
  • PMID: 14978984
Clinical Trial

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients on ventilator

V Darlong et al. Trop Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of the H2-receptor antagonists and sucralfate for the prophylaxis of stress ulcer in patients on a ventilator in an intensive care unit in the general intensive care unit of our institute. A randomized, clinical controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two critically ill patients, who required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group I received ranitidine 50 mg (intravenous) 8 hourly, group II received tablet sucralfate 1 g 8 hourly through a Ryle's tube, whereas group III was not given any drug. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleed, change in gastric pH and growth of gram-negative organisms in the gastric juice and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture were noted and analysed. The treatment groups were similar with respect to the baseline characteristics. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was similar in the ranitidine (12.5%) and sucralfate groups (14.35%) but was high in the control group (57.14%). The mean gastric pH was significantly low in the control group (mean pH 2.07) compared to the ranitidine (mean pH 5.25) and sucralfate groups(mean pH 3.54)(p < 0.05). The incidence of positive culture for gram-negative organisms was significantly high in the ranitidine group (75%) in comparison with the sucralfate group (33.33%) (p < 0.002). However, the incidence of positive growth in the BAL culture was similar in all three groups. We conclude that both ranitidine and sucralfate are equally effective in decreasing the incidence of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and other stress- related lesions. Though ranitidine was more effective in increasing the gastric pH, the incidence of gastric colonization was higher in the ranitidine group compared to the sucralfate group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Pathogenicity of Enterococci.
    Fiore E, Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. Fiore E, et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2019 Jul;7(4):10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0053-2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0053-2018. Microbiol Spectr. 2019. PMID: 31298205 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Effect of histamine-2-receptor antagonists versus sucralfate on stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.
    Huang J, Cao Y, Liao C, Wu L, Gao F. Huang J, et al. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R194. doi: 10.1186/cc9312. Epub 2010 Oct 29. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 21034484 Free PMC article.
  • Pharmacological interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units: a network meta-analysis.
    Toews I, Hussain S, Nyirenda JLZ, Willis MA, Kantorová L, Slezáková S, Boltena MT, Peter JV, Fontes LES, Klugar M, Sadeghirad B, Meerpohl JJ. Toews I, et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jan 22;30(1):22-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112886. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025. PMID: 38997152 Free PMC article.
  • Efficacy and safety of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Alhazzani W, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, Heels-Ansdell D, Brignardello-Petersen R, Alquraini M, Perner A, Møller MH, Krag M, Almenawer S, Rochwerg B, Dionne J, Jaeschke R, Alshahrani M, Deane A, Perri D, Thebane L, Al-Omari A, Finfer S, Cook D, Guyatt G. Alhazzani W, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5005-8. Epub 2017 Dec 4. Intensive Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29199388 Free PMC article.
  • The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.
    Shime N, Nakada TA, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S, Iba T, Ogura H, Kawai Y, Kawaguchi A, Kawasaki T, Kondo Y, Sakuraya M, Taito S, Doi K, Hashimoto H, Hara Y, Fukuda T, Matsushima A, Egi M, Kushimoto S, Oami T, Kikutani K, Kotani Y, Aikawa G, Aoki M, Akatsuka M, Asai H, Abe T, Amemiya Y, Ishizawa R, Ishihara T, Ishimaru T, Itosu Y, Inoue H, Imahase H, Imura H, Iwasaki N, Ushio N, Uchida M, Uchi M, Umegaki T, Umemura Y, Endo A, Oi M, Ouchi A, Osawa I, Oshima Y, Ota K, Ohno T, Okada Y, Okano H, Ogawa Y, Kashiura M, Kasugai D, Kano KI, Kamidani R, Kawauchi A, Kawakami S, Kawakami D, Kawamura Y, Kandori K, Kishihara Y, Kimura S, Kubo K, Kuribara T, Koami H, Koba S, Sato T, Sato R, Sawada Y, Shida H, Shimada T, Shimizu M, Shimizu K, Shiraishi T, Shinkai T, Tampo A, Sugiura G, Sugimoto K, Sugimoto H, Suhara T, Sekino M, Sonota K, Taito M, Takahashi N, Takeshita J, Takeda C, Tatsuno J, Tanaka A, Tani M, Tanikawa A, Chen H, Tsuchida T, Tsutsumi Y, Tsunemitsu T, Deguchi R, Tetsuhara K, Terayama T, Togami Y, Totoki T, Tomoda Y, Nakao S, Nagasawa H, Nakatani Y, Nakanishi N, Nishioka N, Nishikimi M, Noguchi S, Nonami S, Nomura O, Hashimoto K, Hatakeyama J, Hamai Y, Hikone M, Hisamune … See abstract for full author list ➔ Shime N, et al. J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00776-0. J Intensive Care. 2025. PMID: 40087807 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources