Efficacy and tolerability of the dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% combination (COSOPT) versus 0.005% (XALATAN) in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: results from two randomized clinical trials
- PMID: 14982045
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0420.2004.0205.x
Efficacy and tolerability of the dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% combination (COSOPT) versus 0.005% (XALATAN) in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: results from two randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of the fixed dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% combination (COSOPT) versus latanoprost 0.005% (XALATAN).
Methods: Two 3-month, parallel group, randomized, observer-masked and patient-masked, multicentre, clinical trials were performed in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Study 1 (n=256) was conducted in the United States and Study 2 (n=288) was conducted in Europe/Israel. Patients could be included whether or not they were currently taking ocular hypotensive therapy, and regardless of the effectiveness of any previous therapy. Patients were washed out from their usual ocular hypotensive medications and then those with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >/= 24 mmHg were randomized to either the dorzolamide/timolol combination eye drops twice daily or latanoprost eye drops once daily in both eyes. Efficacy was assessed by daytime diurnal IOP (the mean of measurements made at 0800, 1000, 1400 and 1600 h).
Results: At baseline, the mean daytime diurnal IOP was 26.1 mmHg in the dorzolamide/timolol combination group versus 25.6 mmHg in the latanoprost group in Study 1, and 25.3 mmHg in the dorzolamide/timolol combination group versus 24.7 mmHg in the latanoprost group in Study 2. After 3 months, the mean daytime diurnal IOP was 18.9 mmHg for the dorzolamide/timolol combination versus 18.4 mmHg for latanoprost in Study 1, and 17.4 mmHg for the dorzolamide/timolol combination versus 17.5 for latanoprost in Study 2. The difference between treatments in mean IOP change at 3 months was -0.04 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.85, 0.77] in Study 1, and -0.57 mmHg (95% CI -1.31, 0.16) in Study 2. The probability that the true difference lay between -1.5 and 1.5 mmHg, the predefined bounds for equivalence, was >0.950 in both studies. Both treatments were well tolerated over 3 months, although ocular stinging occurred more frequently with the dorzolamide/timolol combination.
Conclusions: The dorzolamide/timolol combination and latanoprost were equally effective at lowering IOP.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: combined analysis of pooled data from two large randomized observer and patient-masked studies.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21(3):242-9. doi: 10.1089/jop.2005.21.242. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2005. PMID: 15969642 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.Ophthalmology. 2004 Feb;111(2):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.019. Ophthalmology. 2004. PMID: 15019375 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of latanoprost with fixed-combination dorzolamide and timolol in adult patients with elevated intraocular pressure: an eight-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study in Latin America.Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):755-68. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90075-6. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15220019 Clinical Trial.
-
Latanoprost : an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.Drugs Aging. 2003;20(8):597-630. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320080-00005. Drugs Aging. 2003. PMID: 12795627 Review.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e83606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083606. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24349536 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials for major prostaglandins: a systematic survey of the ophthalmology literature.Trials. 2008 Dec 3;9:69. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-69. Trials. 2008. PMID: 19055743 Free PMC article.
-
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fixed combination therapy with dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and timolol maleate 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov 22;4:1331-46. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14054. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 21139674 Free PMC article.
-
Topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: a review of its use in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension.Drugs Aging. 2006;23(12):977-95. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623120-00005. Drugs Aging. 2006. PMID: 17154662 Review.
-
Initial Glaucoma Medication in the Hypertensive Phase Following Ahmed Valve Implantation: A Comparison of Results Achieved Using Aqueous Suppressants and Prostaglandin Analogs.J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 3;9(2):416. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020416. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32028663 Free PMC article.
-
Tolerability and effectiveness of preservative-free dorzolamide-timolol (preservative-free COSOPT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul 21;4:581-90. doi: 10.2147/opth.s10337. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20668720 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical