Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar;92(3):833-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.032.

Endometrial carcinoma: paraaortic dissemination

Affiliations

Endometrial carcinoma: paraaortic dissemination

Andrea Mariani et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study was to identify pathologic factors predictive of tumor dissemination to paraaortic lymph nodes (LNs) in endometrial carcinoma. The identification of the risk factors may potentially facilitate selection of patients for radical surgery or radiotherapy directed to the paraaortic area (PAA).

Methods: The study population was a cohort from 612 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer surgically managed at our institution over a 10-year period. Tumor dissemination to the PAA was identified by selecting those patients who had either paraaortic LNs positive for disease at the time of primary surgery or those who subsequently experienced paraaortic failure or both (n=41; the "PA mets" subgroup). Therefore, patients for whom no information was available about the status of paraaortic LNs but who had received adjuvant irradiation to the PAA and those for whom information was not available about sites of recurrent disease were excluded from the analysis, leaving 566 patients to compose the study population.

Results: On the basis of univariate analysis, numerous pathologic variables were significantly (P< or =0.01) associated with PA mets. However, logistic regression analysis identified only two independent factors predictive of PA mets: positive pelvic LNs (P<0.001, OR=5.00) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.01, OR=1.99). Notably, only 2% of patients with negative pelvic LNs had PA mets compared with 47% of those with positive pelvic LNs (P<0.001). When both pelvic LNs and LVI were negative, only 0.8% of the patients had PA mets compared with 31% of patients for whom at least one of the two variables was positive (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Positive pelvic LNs and LVI identify a subgroup of high-risk patients (approximately one sixth of the overall population) who potentially may benefit from formal lymphadenectomy or adjuvant therapy or both directed to the PAA. Furthermore, with 47% of patients with positive pelvic LNs having PA mets, unstaged patients at risk for pelvic LN involvement should be considered candidates for both pelvic and paraaortic external beam radiotherapy or surgical restaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources