Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Feb 26:2:11.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-11.

Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families

Kuang-Yi Wen  1 , David H Gustafson
Affiliations
Review

Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families

Kuang-Yi Wen et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: The assessment of needs for cancer care is a critical step in providing high quality care and achieving cancer patients' and families' satisfaction. Instruments can be used to assess needs and guide cancer care planning. This study discusses the importance of the needs assessment, relationships between needs, satisfaction and quality of life; and reviews the assessment instruments of needs experienced by cancer patients and their families.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE and CANCERLIT data bases. Instruments were evaluated based on their conceptual and measurement models as well as their demonstrated reliability and validity. The authors also sought information pertaining to instruments' burden of administration and responsiveness. Measures compromised by a lack of published psychometric description were not included.

Results: This search identified 17 patient needs assessment instruments and seven family needs assessment instruments. The development and psychometric proprieties of most of these instruments were well documented. However, data on their responsiveness and burden of administration were scarce.

Conclusions: Each selected instrument meets some but not all of our criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. It is questionable whether any instrument can be developed meeting all the requirements. However, there is still a need to continue researching and developing needs assessment instruments leading to effective intervention and improving quality of cancer care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible proximal relationship between needs and quality of life
Figure 2
Figure 2
Possible relationship between needs and satisfaction
Figure 3
Figure 3
Possible relationship between needs, satisfaction and quality of life
Figure 4
Figure 4
Possible relationship between needs and quality of life
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship with satisfaction
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relationship of needs to satisfaction and quality of life
Figure 7
Figure 7
Search and selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berwick D. The total customer relationship in health care: broadening the bandwidth. The Joint Commission Journal On Quality Improvement. 1997;23:245–250. - PubMed
    1. Ross C, Steward C, Sinacore JM. The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Medical Care. 1993;31:1138–1149. - PubMed
    1. Medicine of Institute. In: Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. Field M and Cassel C, editor. Washington, D.C.; 1997. - PubMed
    1. Bretsher M, Rummons R, Sloan J, Kaur J,, Bartlett A, Borkenhagen L, Loprinzi C. Quality of life in hospice patients. Psychosomatics. 1999;40:309–313. - PubMed
    1. Silveira M, EiPiero A, Gerrity M, Geudtner C. Patients knowledge of options at the end of life. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284:2483–2488. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2483. - DOI - PubMed