Prospective study of parental choice for aneuploidy screening in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins
- PMID: 14989809
- DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60524-x
Prospective study of parental choice for aneuploidy screening in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare parental choice towards the use of aneuploidy screening and diagnostic techniques after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived pregnancy. A total of 193 patients with consecutive twin pregnancies participated in the study, including 143 who spontaneously conceived and 50 who conceived following assisted reproduction treatment. Patients were investigated prospectively for their choice in the prenatal screening/diagnosis of aneuploidy. In the group of patients who conceived spontaneously, 111 (77.6%) opted initially for the non-invasive screening based on nuchal translucency measurements, whereas in the assisted conception group, 44 (88%) opted for the non-invasive screening. In the spontaneous conception group, 32 (22.4%) presented because they had a positive serum screening test or because they had opted for a chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or an amniocentesis for advanced maternal age. In the assisted conception group only six patients (12%) opted for amniocentesis. The difference in choice of noninvasive versus invasive screening between those with spontaneous and those with assisted conception was not significant, but those who had conceived spontaneously after the age of 37 years were significantly more likely (P < 0.05) to request an invasive diagnostic procedure through all maternal age groups. When needed, an amniocentesis was preferred to CVS. These data also indicate that the antenatal counselling needs to be adapted to couples presenting with an assisted conception twin pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins.Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):1999-2004. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1999. Hum Reprod. 2001. PMID: 11527912
-
Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):754-67. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011. PMID: 21749753
-
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011. PMID: 21749752
-
Down syndrome screening in assisted conception twins: an iatrogenic medical challenge.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013 Nov;68(11):764-73. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013. PMID: 24193195 Review.
-
Nuchal translucency in pregnancies conceived after assisted reproduction technology.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;18(3):319-24. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000193005.42910.35. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16735833 Review.
Cited by
-
Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1238-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0246-4. Epub 2018 Mar 10. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 29525932
-
Twin gestation pregnancies: genetic counseling and testing experience.J Genet Couns. 2006 Apr;15(2):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-9007-2. J Genet Couns. 2006. PMID: 16642275 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical