Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
- PMID: 14993129
- DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121327.67756.19
Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
Abstract
Background: We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).
Methods and results: Forty-eight ISR lesions (41 patients with objective evidence of ischemia) were treated with SES. Recurrent ISR was identified in 11 lesions (all focal); repeat revascularization was performed in 10. These were compared with 16 patients (19 lesions) without recurrence as documented by angiography. Nine of 11 recurrent lesions had a minimum stent area (MSA) <5.0 mm2 versus 5 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.003); 7 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <4.0 mm2 versus 4 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.02); and 4 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <3.0 mm2 versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.03). A gap between SESs was identified in 3 of 11 recurrences versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions.
Conclusions: Stent underexpansion is a significant cause of failure after SES implantation treatment of ISR.
Comment in
-
Optimal implantation strategies using drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: do we know the answer?Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11):e302. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141457.02676.FD. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15364823 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
