Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Mar;5(3):256-61.
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400101.

A topological view of the replicon

Affiliations
Review

A topological view of the replicon

Jorge B Schvartzman et al. EMBO Rep. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

The replication of circular DNA faces topological obstacles that need to be overcome to allow the complete duplication and separation of newly replicated molecules. Small bacterial plasmids provide a perfect model system to study the interplay between DNA helicases, polymerases, topoisomerases and the overall architecture of partially replicated molecules. Recent studies have shown that partially replicated circular molecules have an amazing ability to form various types of structures (supercoils, precatenanes, knots and catenanes) that help to accommodate the dynamic interplay between duplex unwinding at the replication fork and DNA unlinking by topoisomerases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Supercoiling: its handedness and sign. (A) Negatively supercoiled DNA (left) loses supercoiling due to local DNA unwinding mediated by DNA helicases (shown as grey wedges) and then becomes (+) supercoiled by further strand separation. Notice that the intertwined superhelix is right-handed in (−) supercoiled molecules and left-handed in (+) supercoiled ones. The sign of the duplex–duplex crossings (see panel B) changes from (−) to (+) upon a change from negative to positive supercoiling. (B) Topological convention of sign assignment of perceived crossings. In a (−) crossing, one would need to turn the overlying direction arrow clockwise to align it with the underlying direction arrow (the rotation needs to be smaller than 180°). In a (+) crossing the required rotation would be counterclockwise. Notice that orientation of the underlying and overlying direction arrows at each crossing are not independent from each other but result from assigning a consistent direction along the whole DNA molecule analysed. To facilitate sign recognition in A and B, the overlying and underlying direction arrows are marked in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Topological sign and handedness of duplex–duplex intertwining in supercoiled replication intermediates. (A) Schematic drawing of (−) and (+) supercoiled replication intermediates (RIs). (B) Elastic transition between toroidally wound (around core histones for example) and intertwined form of (−) supercoiled DNA. Notice that, in the toroidally wound form, the segments that cross in a projection run in the same direction around a virtual torus, whereas, in the intertwined form, the crossing segments run in opposite directions around the virtual cylinder enclosed by the DNA. This change of relative orientation causes the topological signs to remain the same despite a perceived change from left- to right-handed winding of the superhelices. The mathematical convention applied in DNA topology assigns a parallel orientation to both strands of DNA (this is required to have a (+) linking number in B-DNA, which forms a right-handed helix; Bates & Maxwell, 1993). For this reason, to trace the linking number contribution of parental strands in an RI, one needs to assign the same direction to both newly replicated duplex regions. In (−) supercoiled DNA there is a tendency to release the torsional stress by left-handed winding of unpaired strands or by flipping runs of alternating purine–pyrimidine from right-handed B-DNA to the left-handed Z-DNA (DiCapua et al, 1983). It is therefore energetically favourable in deproteinized (−) supercoiled RIs that the newly synthesized duplex regions are wound around each other in a left-handed way. The opposite situation applies to (+) supercoiled RIs. The parental duplex is indicated in blue and green, whereas nascent strands are depicted in red.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The topological cycle of a replicon. (A) Unreplicated (−) supercoiled plasmid. (B) Twenty-five per cent replicated (−) supercoiled RI where the parental duplex winds right-handed, whereas the sister duplexes wind in a left-handed manner. (C) Fifty per cent replicated RI where supercoiling is zero. (D) Seventy-five per cent replicated (+) supercoiled RI where the parental duplex winds left-handed, whereas the sister duplexes wind in a right-handed manner. (E) Seventy-five per cent replicated (−) supercoiled RI where the parental duplex winds right-handed, whereas the sister duplexes wind in a left-handed manner. (F) One hundred per cent replicated catenane. (E') Seventy-five per cent replicated (−) supercoiled RI bearing a knotted replication bubble. (D') Seventy-five per cent replicated RI where supercoiling is zero containing two branched four-way Holliday-like junctions, called 'chicken-foot' structures. Red arrows indicate the putative most frequent pathway. Grey arrows show alternative pathways. The parental duplex is indicated in blue and green, whereas nascent strands are depicted in red.
None
None

References

    1. Alexandrov AI, Cozzarelli NR, Holmes VF, Khodursky AB, Peter BJ, Postow L, Rybenkov, Vologodskii AV ( 1999) Mechanisms of separation of the complementary strands of DNA during replication. Genetica 106: 131–140 - PubMed
    1. Bates AD, Maxwell A ( 1989) DNA gyrase can supercoil DNA circles as small as 174 base pairs. EMBO J 8: 1861–1866 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates AD, Maxwell A ( 1993) DNA Topology. New York: Oxford University Press
    1. Bauer WR, Crick FHC, White JH ( 1980) Supercoiled DNA. Sci Am 243: 100–118 - PubMed
    1. Bednar J, Furrer P, Stasiak A, Dubochet J, Egelman EH, Bates AD ( 1994) The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix. Possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. J Mol Biol 235: 825–847 - PubMed

Publication types