Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Sep-Dec;70(3):250-3.

Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants

Affiliations
  • PMID: 14998210
Comparative Study

Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants

Nesrin Eronat et al. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of a compomer and resin sealant in vitro using different surface preparation techniques.

Methods: Microleakage of a compomer (Dyract Seal, DeTrey) and a resin sealant (Helioseal F, Vivadent) was investigated on 125 intact third molars. Materials and the surface preparation techniques were: Group 1--phosphoric acid (37%)+Helioseal F; Group 2--AlO2 air abrasion+Helioseal F; Group 3--nonrinse conditioner (NRC)+Prime&Bond+Dyract Seal; Group 4--phosphoric acid+Dyract Seal; Group 5--AlO2 air abrasion+Dyract Seal.

Results: Pretreatment with phosphoric acid produced the lowest microleakage scores when applied with compomer and resin fissure sealants and there was no statistical difference (P>.05).

Conclusions: Compomer sealant used with a nonrinse conditioner (NRC) was not as successful as pretreatment with phosphoric acid etching, whereas AlO2 air abrasion pretreatment was ineffective in preventing microleakage in both sealants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources