Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Mar;57(3):310-21.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02010.x.

Impact of a short postgraduate course in rational pharmacotherapy for general practitioners

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of a short postgraduate course in rational pharmacotherapy for general practitioners

Ahmet Akici et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: The impact of a short postgraduate course on rational pharmacotherapy planning behaviour of general practitioners (GP) was investigated via a face-to-face interview with 25 GPs working at health centres in Istanbul.

Methods: GPs were randomly allocated to control and intervention groups. Intervention group attended a 3-day-training program preceded and followed by a written exam to plan treatment for simulated cases with a selected indication. The participants' therapeutic competence was also tested at the post-test for an unexposed indication to show the transfer effect of the course. In addition, patients treated by these GP's were interviewed and the prescriptions were analysed regarding rational use of drugs (RUD) principles at the baseline, 2 weeks and 4 months after the course.

Results: At the baseline there was not any significant difference between the control and intervention groups in terms of irrational prescribing habits. The questionnaires revealed that the GPs were not applying RUD rules in making their treatment plans and they were not educating their patients efficiently. Training produced a significant improvement in prescribing habits of the intervention group, which was preserved for 4 months after the course. However, very low scores of the pretest indicate the urgent necessity for solutions.

Conclusions: Training medical doctors on RUD not only at the under- but also at the postgraduate level deserves attention and should be considered by all sides of the problem including academia, health authorities and medical associations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre- and post –test results. Maximum total score was 100; +, p <0.05 compared with A1; *, p <0.05 compared with X. A1: hypertension ‘open’ (formula image), X: hypertension ‘structured’ (formula image), A2: hypertension ‘open’ (formula image), Y: hypertension ‘structured’ (formula image), B1: osteoarthritis ‘open’ (formula image)

References

    1. De Vries TPGM, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, Fresle DA. Geneva: WHO/Action programme on essential drugs; 1994. Guide to Good Prescribing.
    1. De Vries TPGM. Presenting clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. a problem based approach for choosing and prescribing drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;35:581–586. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Grand A, Hogerzeil HV, Haaijer-Ruscamp FM. Intervention research in rational use of drugs: a review. Health Policy Planning. 1999;14:89–102. - PubMed
    1. Ro Laing Hogerzeil HV, Ross-Degnan D. Ten recommendations to improve use of medicines in developing countries. Health Policy Planning. 2001;16(1):13–20. - PubMed
    1. Solomon DH, Houten LV, Glynn RJ, et al. Academic detailing to improve use of broad-spectrum antibiotics at an academic medical center. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1897–1902. - PubMed

Publication types