Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Mar;94(3):393-9.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.393.

Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices

Sherri P Varnell  1 , David M Murray, Jessica B Janega, Jonathan L Blitstein
Affiliations
Review

Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices

Sherri P Varnell et al. Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar.

Abstract

We reviewed group-randomized trials (GRTs) published in the American Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine from 1998 through 2002 and estimated the proportion of GRTs that employ appropriate methods for design and analysis. Of 60 articles, 9 (15.0%) reported evidence of using appropriate methods for sample size estimation. Of 59 articles in the analytic review, 27 (45.8%) reported at least 1 inappropriate analysis and 12 (20.3%) reported only inappropriate analyses. Nineteen (32.2%) reported analyses at an individual or subgroup level, ignoring group, or included group as a fixed effect. Hence increased vigilance is needed to ensure that appropriate methods for GRTs are employed and that results based on inappropriate methods are not published.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Donner A, Brown KS, Brasher P. A methodologic review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979–1989. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19:795–800. - PubMed
    1. Ennett ST, Tobler NS, Ringwalt CL, Flewelling RL. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1394–1401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simpson JM, Klar N, Donner A. Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1378–1383. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith PJ, Moffatt MEK, Gelskey SC, Hudson S, Kaita K. Are community health interventions evaluated appropriately? A review of six journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:137–146. - PubMed
    1. Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL. Design and analysis of grouprandomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:423–432. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources