Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jan;9(1):36-47.
doi: 10.1017/s1092852900008348.

Outcome measures for clinical drug trials in autism

Affiliations
Review

Outcome measures for clinical drug trials in autism

Michael G Aman et al. CNS Spectr. 2004 Jan.

Abstract

This paper identifies instruments and measures that may be appropriate for randomized clinical trials in participants with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). The Clinical Global Impressions scale was recommended for all randomized clinical trials. At this point, however, there is no "perfect" choice of outcome measure for core features of autism, although we will discuss five measures of potential utility. Several communication instruments are recommended, based in part on suitability across the age range. In trials where the intention is to alter core features of ASDs, adaptive behavior scales are also worthy of consideration. Several "behavior complexes" common to ASDs are identified, and instruments are recommended for assessment of these. Given the prevalence of cognitive impairment in ASDs, it is important to assess any cognitive effects, although cognitive data from ASD randomized clinical trials, thus far, are minimal. Guidance from trials in related pharmacologic areas and behavioral pharmacology may be helpful. We recommend routine elicitation of side effects, height and weight, vital signs, and (in the case of antipsychotics) extrapyramidal side-effects assessment. It is often appropriate to include laboratory tests and assessments for continence and sleep pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manuel for Psychopharmacology, Revised. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. US Department Health Education and Welfare Pub (ADM); 1976. pp. 76–338.
    1. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavre PC. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOS-G) San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corp; 1998.
    1. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Devellis RF, Daly K. Toward objective classification of childhood autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1980;10:91–103. - PubMed
    1. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles, Calif: Western Psychological Services; 1988.
    1. Constantino JN, Davis SA, Reich W, et al. Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the Social Responsiveness Scale with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. J Autism Dev Disord. In press. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources