Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 May 15;557(Pt 1):321-30.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.057133. Epub 2004 Mar 5.

Modulation of arterial baroreflex dynamic response during mild orthostatic stress in humans

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Modulation of arterial baroreflex dynamic response during mild orthostatic stress in humans

Masashi Ichinose et al. J Physiol. .

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that in humans, carotid-baroreflex dynamic responses (evaluated by examining the time course of the carotid-baroreflex-induced alterations in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)) would be altered during mild orthostatic stress in ways that serve to limit orthostatic hypotension. In 12 healthy subjects (10 male, 2 female), 5-s periods of neck pressure (NP) (50 mmHg) and neck suction (NS) (-60 mmHg) were used to evaluate carotid baroreflex function at rest (CON) and during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) (-15 mmHg). During LBNP (as compared with CON) (a) the augmentations in MSNA and MAP elicited by NP were greater, (b) the NS-induced period of MSNA suppression was, if anything, shorter, (c) the peak decrement in MAP elicited by NS, although not different in amplitude, occurred earlier and recovered to its initial level more quickly after NS, and (d) the HR responses to NP and NS were greater. These results suggest that during mild orthostatic stress, carotid-baroreflex dynamic responses are modulated in ways that should help maintain blood pressure and limit orthostatic hypotension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. General experimental protocol (A) and sequence used for application of each neck-chamber stimulus (B)
NP-NS, neck-chamber stimuli (neck pressure or suction).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. MSNA response in one subject to application of neck pressure (A) and neck suction (B) in control and LBNP situations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Averaged reflex alterations (n = 10–12 subjects) in MSNA (A), MAP (B) and HR (C) elicited by neck pressure in control and LBNP situations
Significant difference from value obtained at 3 s prior to application of neck pressure, P < 0.05. †Significant difference from control, P < 0.05.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Averaged reflex alterations (n = 10–12 subjects) in MSNA (A), MAP (B) and HR (C) elicited by neck suction in control and LBNP situations
Significant difference from value obtained at 3 s prior to application of neck suction, P < 0.05. †Significant difference from control, P < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bath E, Lindblad LE, Wallin BG. Effects of dynamic and static neck suction on muscle nerve sympathetic activity, heart rate, and blood pressure in man. J Physiol. 1981;311:551–564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bevegård S, Castenfors J, Lindblad E, Tranesjö J. Blood pressure and heart rate regulation capacity of the carotid sinus during changes in blood volume distribution in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1977;99:300–312. - PubMed
    1. Delius W, Hagbarth KE, Hongell A, Wallin BG. General characteristics of sympathetic activity in human muscle nerves. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972;84:65–81. - PubMed
    1. Ebert TJ. Carotid baroreceptor reflex regulation of forearm vascular resistance in man. J Physiol. 1983;337:655–664. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckberg DL. Nonlinearities of the human carotid baroreceptor-cardiac reflex. Circ Res. 1980;47:208–216. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources