Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Aug;30(8):2042-6.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2042-2046.1992.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease: comparison of a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B with a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxin A only and two cytotoxicity assays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease: comparison of a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B with a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxin A only and two cytotoxicity assays

G V Doern et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug.

Abstract

A total of 320 stool specimens obtained from 262 patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease were examined with two cytotoxicity assays (CTAs) and two commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). The CTAs were an in-house-developed procedure (University of Massachusetts Medical Center [UMMC], Worcester, Mass.) and a commercial test (Bartels CTA; Baxter Healthcare Corp., West Sacramento, Calif.). One EIA was a monoclonal antibody-based assay for C. difficile toxins A and B (Cambridge Biotech Corp. [CBC], Worcester, Mass.). The other EIA employed monoclonal antibodies directed against only toxin A (Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, Ohio). True-positive and true-negative results were defined on the basis of the results of the four assays, clinical assessments of patients, and the results of other laboratory tests. The sensitivities of the four assays were as follows: Bartels CTA, 100%; UMMC CTA, 97.2%; CBC EIA, 84.5%; and Meridian EIA, 69.0%. The Bartels CTA demonstrated a specificity of 99.2%. The other three assays had a specificity of 100%.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Infect Dis. 1981 Jan;143(1):42-50 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1982 Sep-Oct;1(5):336-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2639-42 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2666-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 May;27(5):889-93 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources