Impact of drug levels and baseline genotype and phenotype on the virologic response to amprenavir/ritonavir-based salvage regimens
- PMID: 15006188
- DOI: 10.1089/108729104322740857
Impact of drug levels and baseline genotype and phenotype on the virologic response to amprenavir/ritonavir-based salvage regimens
Abstract
Coadministration of amprenavir (APV) with small doses of ritonavir (RTV) results in a significant increase in APV plasma concentrations. Viruses showing resistance to other protease inhibitors (PI) may remain susceptible to APV, supporting a role for this drug in salvage therapy. We enrolled 35 patients who began a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 mg twice daily. Their median viral load before beginning APV/RTV was 4.15 logs and their median CD4 count was 247 cells per microliter. The median prior PI exposure was of 43 months. At baseline, the median number of PI resistance mutations was 7. A significant virologic response (VR) (>1 log drop in plasma HIV-RNA and/or to <50 copies per milliliter) was recorded in 21.7% (5/23) of treated patients at week 48 (14.3% in the intent-to-treat analysis). The VR was significantly more frequent among subjects with less than 5 PI resistance mutations (66.6% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.008). Patients with prior exposure to lopinavir showed VR significantly less frequently than those not exposed to that drug (11% versus 60%; p < 0.05). The mean APV plasma trough concentration at week 12 was 1.3 microg/mL, and did not differ significantly comparing subjects having or not having VR. A trend toward a higher VR rate at week 48 was noticed among subjects with high genotypic inhibitory quotients (GIQ). In summary, HIV genotyping but not drug levels might be helpful to predict which patients would benefit from a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 twice daily.
Similar articles
-
Performance of six different ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients.HIV Clin Trials. 2006 Jul-Aug;7(4):163-71. doi: 10.1310/hct0704-163. HIV Clin Trials. 2006. PMID: 17065028
-
Predictive value of drug levels, HIV genotyping, and the genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on response to saquinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients.J Med Virol. 2005 Dec;77(4):460-4. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20477. J Med Virol. 2005. PMID: 16254964
-
Salvage therapy with amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d in HIV-infected patients in virological failure.Antivir Ther. 2004 Aug;9(4):615-25. Antivir Ther. 2004. PMID: 15456093 Clinical Trial.
-
Amprenavir or fosamprenavir plus ritonavir in HIV infection: pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability profile.Drugs. 2005;65(5):633-59. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565050-00005. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15748098 Review.
-
Salvage therapy for HIV infection: when and how.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2000 Sep;14(9):465-76. doi: 10.1089/108729100438845. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2000. PMID: 11051629 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Two different patterns of mutations are involved in the genotypic resistance score for atazanavir boosted versus unboosted by ritonavir in multiple failing patients.Infection. 2009 Jun;37(3):233-43. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8065-4. Epub 2009 Jan 23. Infection. 2009. PMID: 19169632
-
Predictive value of pharmacokinetics-adjusted phenotypic susceptibility on response to ritonavir-enhanced protease inhibitors (PIs) in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects failing prior PI therapy.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jun;53(6):2335-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01387-08. Epub 2009 Mar 23. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009. PMID: 19307363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous