Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study
- PMID: 15008774
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00085.x
Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study
Abstract
Objective: It has been suggested that women over 50 with a satisfactory negative smear history are at low risk for dyskaryosis and might be suitable for withdrawal from the cervical screening programme. The objectives of this study are to document the pattern of dyskaryosis in the cervical smears of women over 50 and to relate the risk of dyskaryosis in these women to the prior smear history.
Design: Available computerised smear data were analysed.
Setting: Five regions in England and Scotland; Aberdeen, Dundee, Birmingham, Gateshead and Nottingham.
Population: All women aged 50 or over who had a satisfactory smear between 1988 and 1996.
Methods: Smear results were sorted into individual smear records. The first smear after the age of 50 was identified as well as all smears before and after the age of 50.
Main outcome measurements: The smear history before and after the age of 50 was determined for all women. The relative risk of dyskaryosis as well as the time to dyskaryosis was calculated for women whose raw data were available.
Results: The study included 170,436 women with at least one satisfactory smear after 50. No results of previous smears were available in 90,546 (54%) of women but 36,512 (21%) of women had a satisfactory negative smear history. Women with prior dyskaryosis or borderline nuclear abnormalities (BNA) had an increased risk of dyskaryosis after the age of 50 compared with women with a negative history (RR 4.39 and 3.08 respectively). It was notable that 1.8% of women with a negative history still demonstrated subsequent dyskaryosis.
Conclusions: Women with either dyskaryosis or BNA before 50 are not suitable for withdrawal from cervical screening. Well-screened women with a negative smear history at the age 50 still have a residual risk of subsequently developing a new abnormality.
Similar articles
-
Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears.Br J Cancer. 2009 Jun 2;100(11):1832-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605069. Epub 2009 May 5. Br J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19417745 Free PMC article.
-
The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.J Med Screen. 2006;13(2):72-5. doi: 10.1258/096914106777589687. J Med Screen. 2006. PMID: 16792828
-
Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.BMJ. 1990 Sep 29;301(6753):641-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6753.641. BMJ. 1990. PMID: 2224218 Free PMC article.
-
Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.BMJ. 1994 May 28;308(6941):1399-403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1399. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 8019248 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long term follow up of women with borderline cervical smear test results: effects of age and viral infection on progression to high grade dyskaryosis.BMJ. 1992 May 9;304(6836):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6836.1209. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1325232 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk of cervical abnormality after age 50 in women with previously negative smears.Br J Cancer. 2009 Jun 2;100(11):1832-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605069. Epub 2009 May 5. Br J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19417745 Free PMC article.
-
Human papillomavirus infection in women who develop high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer: a case-control study in the UK.Br J Cancer. 2005 May 9;92(9):1794-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602538. Br J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15827556 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical human papillomavirus screening among older women.Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Nov;11(11):1680-5. doi: 10.3201/eid1111.050575. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 16318718 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50: prospective observational study.BMJ. 2009 Apr 24;338:b1354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1354. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19395420 Free PMC article.
-
Point: cervical cancer screening guidelines should consider observational data on screening efficacy in older women.Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 1;178(7):1020-2. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt167. Epub 2013 Aug 21. Am J Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23966563 Free PMC article.