Midterm results of beating heart surgery in 1-vessel disease: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with full sternotomy
- PMID: 15011666
Midterm results of beating heart surgery in 1-vessel disease: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with full sternotomy
Abstract
Background: Off-pump cardiac surgery is becoming an established method of surgical revascularization. However, performing anastomoses on a beating heart can be challenging, especially through small incisions. We compared our midterm results in patients with 1 vessel disease using full sternotomy (OPCAB) or a left anterior minithoracotomy (MIDCAB).
Methods: At our institution between December 1996 and December 1998, 102 patients (OPCAB, n = 45, MIDCAB, n = 57); age, 61 +/- 11 years; 69% men with 1-vessel disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) underwent off-pump myocardial revascularization through the left internal thoracic artery (LITA). In the OPCAB group 17 (37.8%) of the patients received an additional vein graft to a diagonal branch. OPCAB was generally preferred in obese or high-risk patients or patients with a long LITA-LAD distance (>7 cm) on an electron beam computed tomography of the chest.
Results: Operative mortality was 0. Time of surgery (169 +/- 48 versus 197 +/- 45 minutes) and coronary artery occlusion time (19 +/- 7 versus 23 +/- 6 minutes) were significantly lower (P = .004 and P = .009) in the OPCAB group. MIDCAB surgery was related to a higher incidence of occluded (4 versus 0; P = .039) or stenosed (7 versus 2; P = .06) anastomoses and necessity for immediate reintervention (9 versus 0; P = .023). During a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years, MIDCAB patients (6 MIDCAB patients versus 1 OPCAB patient) tended to need more coronary interventions and develop more recurrent angina (23 MIDCAB versus 12 OPCAB patients). Two OPCAB patients died during the follow-up period.
Conclusions: Our initial experience in beating heart surgery demonstrated that MIDCAB is technically more challenging than OPCAB. MIDCAB procedures should therefore be performed by experienced surgeons on selected patients. Midterm results after OPCAB procedures tend to a lower rate of adverse cardiac events.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery.Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(2):157-62. Heart Surg Forum. 2002. PMID: 12114131
-
High-risk patients with multivessel disease--is there a role for incomplete myocardial revascularization via minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting?Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(6):E459-62. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20061193. Heart Surg Forum. 2007. PMID: 18187378
-
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276503 Review.
-
Influence of Innovative Techniques on Midterm Results in Patients with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass.Heart Surg Forum. 2004 Jan 1;7(1):31-36. Heart Surg Forum. 2004. PMID: 14980846
-
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17300948 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Effectiveness of Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review.Clin Pract. 2024 Sep 10;14(5):1842-1868. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14050147. Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 39311297 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 21;11:1298466. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1298466. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38450373 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with an improved rib spreader and a new-shaped cardiac stabilizer: results of 200 consecutive cases in a single institution.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 17;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0216-4. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016. PMID: 26883122 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):302-309. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0631-x. Epub 2018 Jan 18. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 33060953 Free PMC article.
-
Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1385108. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1385108. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39280035 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical