Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Aug;68(2):368-71.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90347-d.

Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin

F Kawano et al. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Aug.

Abstract

The bond strength of six commercial soft denture liners was evaluated using a modified tensile test. The soft denture liners investigated were Prolastic, VinaSoft, Flexor, Molloplast-B, Novus, and Super-Soft. The samples were processed according to the manufacturers' instructions to cured denture base resin (polymethyl methacrylate; PMMA). The soft denture liners were 10 x 10 x 3 mm and were processed between two PMMA blocks. The samples were placed in tension until failure. The mode of failure, cohesive or adhesive, was also recorded. The results of this study showed that the bond strength is related to the components of the materials. Prolastic, VinaSoft, and Flexor had the lowest bond strength to cured PMMA and ranged from 9.6 to 11.3 kg/cm2. Super-Soft, Novus, and Molloplast-B demonstrated better bond strengths and ranged from 16.7 to 17.6 kg/cm2. The bond strength of Novus could be improved by using the recommended bonding agent and bonded Novus at 26.1 kg/cm2 had the highest bond strength of all materials tested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources