Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Mar;5(2):105-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2004.00195.x.

Nevirapine- versus efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients with advanced HIV infection

W Manosuthi  1 , S Sungkanuparph, A Vibhagool, S Rattanasiri, A Thakkinstian
Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Nevirapine- versus efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients with advanced HIV infection

W Manosuthi et al. HIV Med. 2004 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To compare virological and immunological responses to nevirapine (NVP)-based and efavirenz (EFV)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients with advanced HIV infection.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients whose pretreatment CD4 cell counts were less than 100 cells/microL or whose viral loads were greater than 100,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL.

Results: Baseline characteristics of patients in the NVP (n=24) and EFV (n=29) groups were not different. The proportion of patients with viral loads >100,000 copies/mL was higher in the EFV group. The probability of virological success estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method showed that 3- and 6-month success rates were 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.7-52.2%] and 63.1% (95% CI: 44.7-81.3%) for the NVP group. The corresponding values were 41.2% (95% CI: 25.8-61.0%) and 62.9% (95% CI: 45.7-80.1%) for the EFV-based group. The median success times of the two groups were about 4 and 3 months (P=0.678), respectively, for NVP and EFV. Cox's proportional hazard was used after adjusting for age, previous opportunistic infections (OIs), and viral load at baseline, and showed that patients who received the NVP-based regimen had about 25% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, 95% CI: 0.37-1.51] less chance of virological success than patients who received the EFV-based regimen (P=0.415). The median times to CD4 > or =100 cells/microL were 5.6 and 4.4 months for the NVP- and EFV-based regimens, respectively (log-rank test, P=0.144).

Conclusions: NVP- and EFV-based HAART regimens as initial regimens in patients with advanced HIV infection are effective and comparable, in term of virological and immunological responses. However, further large-scale randomized controlled clinical trials in this group of patients with advanced HIV infection are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types