Enhanced stimulation of chromosomal translocations by radiomimetic DNA damaging agents and camptothecin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad9 checkpoint mutants
- PMID: 15013706
- PMCID: PMC10195026
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.12.010
Enhanced stimulation of chromosomal translocations by radiomimetic DNA damaging agents and camptothecin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad9 checkpoint mutants
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad9 checkpoint mutants exhibit pleiotropic phenotypes, including higher frequencies of chromosome loss, radiation sensitivity, and decreased induction of DNA damage-inducible genes. We had previously shown that rad9 mutants exhibit higher frequencies of DNA damage-associated translocations but lower frequencies of DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchange (SCE), compared to wild type. Herein, we have shown that differences between the frequencies of DNA damage-associated recombination in the rad9 mutant and wild type depend on the identity and the concentration of the DNA damaging agent. Translocation and SCE frequencies were measured in strains containing truncated his3 fragments, located either on chromosomes II and IV, or located in tandem on chromosome IV, respectively. DNA damage-associated frequencies of translocations after exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), bleomycin, phleomycin, cisplatin, and camptothecin are higher in the rad9 diploid than in wild type. However, translocation frequencies after exposure to 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) are similar in rad9 and wild-type strains. We suggest that the deficiency in triggering G(2) arrest after exposure to specific DNA damaging agents results in the higher levels of DNA damage-associated translocations in rad9 mutants.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents.DNA Repair (Amst). 2005 Nov 21;4(11):1240-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Jul 21. DNA Repair (Amst). 2005. PMID: 16039914 Free PMC article.
-
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations.Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;18(3):1190-200. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.3.1190. Mol Cell Biol. 1998. PMID: 9488434 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced stimulation of chromosomal translocations and sister chromatid exchanges by either HO-induced double-strand breaks or ionizing radiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yku70 mutants.Mutat Res. 2005 Oct 15;578(1-2):158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jun 28. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15990123 Free PMC article.
-
DNA-damaging agents stimulate the formation of directed reciprocal translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mutat Res. 1994 Mar;314(2):121-33. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90076-0. Mutat Res. 1994. PMID: 7510362
-
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes RAD9, CHK1 and PDS1 are required for elevated homologous recombination in a mec1 (ATR) hypomorphic mutant.Cell Cycle. 2008 Aug;7(15):2418-26. doi: 10.4161/cc.6411. Epub 2008 Jun 9. Cell Cycle. 2008. PMID: 18677117
Cited by
-
Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents.DNA Repair (Amst). 2005 Nov 21;4(11):1240-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Jul 21. DNA Repair (Amst). 2005. PMID: 16039914 Free PMC article.
-
Checkpoint and recombination pathways independently suppress rates of spontaneous homology-directed chromosomal translocations in budding yeast.Front Genet. 2025 Apr 4;16:1479307. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1479307. eCollection 2025. Front Genet. 2025. PMID: 40255487 Free PMC article.
-
Both RAD5-dependent and independent pathways are involved in DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchange in budding yeast.AIMS Genet. 2017;4(2):84-102. doi: 10.3934/genet.2017.2.84. Epub 2017 Mar 30. AIMS Genet. 2017. PMID: 28596989 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage.Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2006;81:179-229. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6603(06)81005-6. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16891172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genome-destabilizing effects associated with top1 loss or accumulation of top1 cleavage complexes in yeast.PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 1;11(4):e1005098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005098. eCollection 2015 Apr. PLoS Genet. 2015. PMID: 25830313 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weinert T, DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 8 (1988) 183–185. - PubMed
-
- Nyberg K, Michelson R, Putnam C, Weinert TA, Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints, Ann. Rev. Genet 36 (2002) 617–657. - PubMed
-
- Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington DC, 1995.
-
- Weinert TA, Hartwell LH, The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Sacchromyces cerevisiae, Science 241 (1988) 317–322. - PubMed
-
- Flattery-O’Brien JA, W Dawes I, Hydrogen peroxide causes RAD9-dependent cell cycle arrest in G2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereas menadione causes G1 arrest independent of RAD9 function, J. Biol. Chem 273 (1998) 8564–8571. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials