Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice
- PMID: 15017624
- DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(03)00317-3
Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice
Abstract
Background and aims: Since Medicare approval for reimbursement of screening colonoscopies, the number of colonoscopy requests has increased. Physician resources have often been inadequate to meet the demand. We sought to reduce the demand for colonoscopy in an open endoscopy system by using a guideline-based triage system to eliminate inappropriate procedures and to align the timing of surveillance colonoscopies with recommendations made by national organizations.
Methods: This was a cohort study with primary care outpatients. From October 2002 to February 2003, 498 consecutive patients on a waiting list of 2400 awaiting colonoscopy for all indications were triaged and are the focus of the study. Selection of patients for appropriate colonoscopy was based on consensus guidelines developed for institutional use by using established published guidelines for appropriate colonoscopy indications.
Results: Of the 498 consecutive patients triaged, 139 (28%) were deemed inappropriate. The most common reason was inappropriate referral for surveillance of colorectal polyps. The percentage of inappropriate referrals by the 3 largest referring specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, and gastroenterology) combined was also 28% with no statistically significant differences between specialties.
Conclusions: Most referrals for colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system were appropriate, although about 1 in 4 were not. Use of triage and further education of physicians regarding colonoscopy may optimize colonoscopy utilization.
Similar articles
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a university hospital.Med J Malaysia. 2004 Mar;59(1):34-8. Med J Malaysia. 2004. PMID: 15535333
-
Why wait for a colonoscopy? An easy cure.Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jul;8(6):480-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00922.x. Colorectal Dis. 2006. PMID: 16784466
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00240.x. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006. PMID: 16412034
-
Performance of gastrointestinal tract endoscopy by primary care physicians. Lessons from the US Medicare database.Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):52-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.1.52. Arch Fam Med. 1997. PMID: 9003171 Review.
-
Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):94-101. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.94. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25685265 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Survey of access to gastroenterology in Canada: the SAGE wait times program.Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;24(1):20-5. doi: 10.1155/2010/246492. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20186352 Free PMC article.
-
Open-Access Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy as an Effective and Safe Strategy for Patients With Non-alarming Symptoms.Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54792. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54792. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38529453 Free PMC article.
-
Diversity of endoscopy center operations and practice variation across California's safety-net hospital system: a statewide survey.BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jun 15;6:233. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-233. BMC Res Notes. 2013. PMID: 23767938 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk amongst Colonoscopy Patients New to an Open-Access Endoscopy Center.ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012;2012:152980. doi: 10.5402/2012/152980. Epub 2012 Mar 22. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22536519 Free PMC article.
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03352-2. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39160458 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical