Fatigue models as practical tools: diagnostic accuracy and decision thresholds
- PMID: 15018281
Fatigue models as practical tools: diagnostic accuracy and decision thresholds
Abstract
Human fatigue models are increasingly being used in a variety of industrial settings, both civilian and military. Current uses include education, awareness, and analysis of individual or group work schedules. Perhaps the ultimate and potentially most beneficial use of human fatigue models is to diagnose if an individual is sufficiently rested to perform a period of duty safely or effectively. When used in this way, two important questions should be asked: 1) What is the accuracy of the diagnosis for duty-specific performance in this application; and 2) What decision threshold is appropriate for this application (i.e., how "fatigued" does an individual have to be to be considered "not safe"). In the simplest situation, a diagnostic fatigue test must distinguish between two states: "fatigued" and "not fatigued," and the diagnostic decisions are "safe" (or "effective") and "not safe" (or "not effective"). The resulting four decision outcomes include diagnostic errors because diagnostic tests are not perfectly accurate. Moreover, since all outcomes have costs and benefits associated with them that differ between applications, the choice of a decision criterion is extremely important. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) has demonstrated usefulness in measuring the accuracy of diagnostic tests and optimizing diagnostic decisions. This paper describes how SDT can be applied to foster the development of fatigue models as practical diagnostic and decision-making tools. By clarifying the difference between accuracy (or sensitivity) and decision criterion (or bias) in the use of fatigue models as diagnostic and decision-making tools, the SDT framework focuses on such critical issues as duty-specific performance, variability (model and performance), and model sensitivity, efficacy, and utility. As fatigue models become increasingly used in a variety of different applications, it is important that end-users understand the interplay of these factors for their particular application.
Similar articles
-
Research requirements for operational decision-making using models of fatigue and performance.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Mar;75(3 Suppl):A192-9. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004. PMID: 15018284 Review.
-
A model to predict work-related fatigue based on hours of work.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Mar;75(3 Suppl):A61-9; discussion A70-4. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004. PMID: 15018266
-
A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1350-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0519. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 17079536
-
Framework for use of toxicity screening tools in context-based decision-making.Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 May;45(5):759-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.025. Epub 2006 Nov 2. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007. PMID: 17215066
-
Critical research issues in development of biomathematical models of fatigue and performance.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Mar;75(3 Suppl):A181-91. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004. PMID: 15018283 Review.
Cited by
-
Proposed Data-Driven Approach for Occupational Risk Management of Aircrew Fatigue.Saf Health Work. 2021 Dec;12(4):462-470. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Saf Health Work. 2021. PMID: 34900365 Free PMC article.
-
A Unified Model of Performance: Validation of its Predictions across Different Sleep/Wake Schedules.Sleep. 2016 Jan 1;39(1):249-62. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5358. Sleep. 2016. PMID: 26518594 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials