The effect of physical activity and its interaction with nutrition on bone health
- PMID: 15018482
- DOI: 10.1079/PNS2003304
The effect of physical activity and its interaction with nutrition on bone health
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) is a popular therapy for the prevention and treatment of bone loss and osteoporosis because it has no adverse side effects, it is low cost, and it confers additional benefits such as postural stability and fall prevention. Bone mass is regulated by mechanical loading, and is limited but not controlled by diet. The mechanism by which strain thresholds turn bone remodelling 'on' and 'off' is known as the mechanostat theory. Research in animals has shown that optimal strains are dynamic, with a high change rate, an unusual distribution and a high magnitude of strain, but the results of randomized controlled trials in human subjects have been somewhat equivocal. In the absence of weight-bearing activity nutritional or endocrine interventions cannot maintain bone mass. Biochemical markers of bone turnover predict bone mass changes, and findings from our research group and others have shown that both acute and chronic exercise can reduce bone resorption. Similarly, Ca intervention studies have shown that supplementation can reduce bone resorption. Several recent meta-analytical reviews concur that changes in bone mass with exercise are typically 2-3%. Some of these studies suggest that Ca intake may influence the impact of PA on bone, with greater effects in Ca-replete subjects. Comparative studies between Asian (high PA, low Ca intake) and US populations (low PA, high Ca intake) suggest that PA may permit an adaptation to low Ca intakes. Whether Ca and PA interact synergistically is one of the most important questions unanswered in the area of lifestyle-related bone health research.
Similar articles
-
[Diet, nutrition and bone health].Clin Ter. 2005 Jan-Apr;156(1-2):47-56. Clin Ter. 2005. PMID: 16080661 Review. Italian.
-
The role of dietary calcium in bone health.Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Nov;62(4):851-8. doi: 10.1079/PNS2003301. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003. PMID: 15018485 Review.
-
Low bone mass in premenopausal chronic dieting obese women.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;58(6):966-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601922. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15164118
-
Influence of calcium intake and physical activity on proximal femur bone mass and structure among pre- and postmenopausal women. A 10-year prospective study.Calcif Tissue Int. 2008 Mar;82(3):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s00223-008-9105-x. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008. PMID: 18270646
-
Calcium intake, calcium bioavailability and bone health.Br J Nutr. 2002 May;87 Suppl 2:S169-77. doi: 10.1079/BJNBJN/2002534. Br J Nutr. 2002. PMID: 12088515 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of core balance training on Cobb angle, isokinetic torque, and balance in unilateral handed athletes.J Exerc Rehabil. 2020 Jun 30;16(3):279-285. doi: 10.12965/jer.2040266.133. eCollection 2020 Jun. J Exerc Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32724786 Free PMC article.
-
Seasonal variation of bone turnover markers in top-level female skiers.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Mar;111(3):433-40. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1664-7. Epub 2010 Sep 29. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20878421
-
Determinants of bone mass and bone size in a large cohort of physically active young adult men.Nutr Metab (Lond). 2006 Feb 15;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-3-14. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2006. PMID: 16480509 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting Compliance With Weight-Bearing Restriction and the Amount of Weight-Bearing in the Elderly With Femur or Pelvic Fractures.Ann Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;44(2):109-116. doi: 10.5535/arm.2020.44.2.109. Epub 2020 Apr 29. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020. PMID: 32392649 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of locomotion on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell fate: insight into mechanical regulation and bone formation.Cell Biosci. 2021 May 17;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00601-9. Cell Biosci. 2021. PMID: 34001272 Free PMC article. Review.