Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar 26;99(1):43-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.009.

Safety and efficacy of a modified-live canine coronavirus vaccine in dogs

Affiliations

Safety and efficacy of a modified-live canine coronavirus vaccine in dogs

A Pratelli et al. Vet Microbiol. .

Abstract

The safety and the efficacy of a modified-live (ML) canine coronavirus (CCoV) vaccine strain 257/98-3c was evaluated in 14 dogs seronegative and virus negative for CCoV. For the safety test, four dogs were inoculated, two by intramuscular and two by oronasal route, with 10 times the vaccinal dose. During the observation period (28 days) all dogs did not display any local or systemic reaction. For the efficacy test, eight dogs were vaccinated by intramuscular (four dogs-group A) or by oronasal route (four dogs-group B). Two dogs were maintained as non-vaccinated controls. In the dogs of group A, vaccinal virus was not detected in faecal samples by virus isolation (VI) and by PCR assay, while in the dogs of group B, the virus was revealed for six median days only by PCR. Twenty-eight days later, the vaccinated and control dogs were challenged with a field CCoV strain. After the challenge, the vaccinated dogs did not display clinical signs and the dogs of group A shed virus for 5.5 median days, evaluated by VI, and for 10 median days evaluated by PCR. Virus shedding was not observed, both by VI and PCR assay, in the dogs of group B. The two control dogs displayed moderate clinical signs and the virus was detected by VI for 14.5 median days starting from day 3 post-challenge (dpc 3) and by PCR assay for 23 median days starting from dpc 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Serological responses in dogs after CCoV vaccination and CCoV challenge: (◆) dogs vaccinated by intramuscular route; (•) dogs vaccinated by oronasal route; (○) unvaccinated dogs. VN titers are expressed as the reciprocal (log2) of the geometric means. ELISA OD median values are shown in brackets.

References

    1. Appel M.J.G. Does canine coronavirus augment the effect of subsequent parvovirus infection? Vet. Med. 1988;83:360–366.
    1. Carmichael, L.E., 1997. Vaccines for dogs. In: Pastoret, P.-P., Blancou, J., Vannier, P., Verschueren, C. (Eds.), Veterinary Vaccinology. Elsevier, New York, pp. 326–335.
    1. de Vries A.A.F., Horzinek M.C., Rottier P.J.M., de Groot R.J. The genome organization of the Nidovirales: similarities and differences between arteri-, toro-, and coronaviruses. Semin. Virol. 1997;8:33–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elia G., Decaro N., Tinelli A., Martella V., Pratelli A., Buonavoglia C. Evaluation of antibody response to canine coronavirus infection in dogs by Western blotting analysis. New Microbiol. 2002;25:275–280. - PubMed
    1. Enjuanes, L., Brian, D., Cavanagh, D., Holmes, K., Lai, M.M.C., Laude, H., Masters, P., Rottier, P., Siddell, S., Spaan, W.J.M., Taguchi, F., Talbot, P., 2000. Coronaviridae. In: van Regenmortel, M.H.V., Fauquet, C.M., Bishop, D.H.L., Carstens, E.B., Estes, M.K., Lemon, S.M., Maniloff, J., Mayo, M.A., McGeoch, D.J., Pringle, C.R., Wickner, R.B. (Eds.), Virus Taxonomy, Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. Academic Press, New York, pp. 835–849.

Publication types

MeSH terms