Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Nov;63(11):1372-8.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019422. Epub 2004 Mar 5.

Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

L Fraenkel et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To elicit treatment preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with varying risk profiles.

Methods: Patient values for 16 DMARD characteristics were ascertained using published data about side effects, effectiveness, and cost. Patient preferences were determined by Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, an interactive computer program that predicts preferences by asking patients to make trade-offs between specific treatment characteristics. Simulations were run to derive preferences for four drugs: methotrexate, gold, leflunomide, and etanercept, under different risk-benefit scenarios. Infliximab was not included because it is given with methotrexate, and we did not include preferences for combination therapy. Based on each patient's expressed preferences, and the characteristics of the treatments available at the time of the study, the option that best fitted each patient's perspective was identified.

Results: 120 patients (mean age 70 years) were interviewed. For the base case scenario (which assumed the maximum benefits reported in the literature, a low probability of adverse effects, and low equal monthly "co-pays" (out of pocket costs)), 95% of the respondents preferred etanercept over the other treatment options. When all four options were described as being equally effective, 88% continued to prefer etanercept owing to its safer short term adverse effect profile. Increasing etanercept's co-pay to $30.00 decreased the percentage of patients preferring this option to 80%.

Conclusions: In this study, older patients with RA, when asked to consider trade-offs between specific risk and benefits, preferred etanercept over other treatment options. Preference for etanercept is explained by older patients' risk aversion for drug toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
y axis: change in utility reflects how much patients valued elimination of the risk of specific adverse effects or maximal gains in improvement. x axis: range of benefits and risk of adverse effects associated with the DMARDs studied. Yellow: drug characteristics describing benefits; blue: drug characteristics describing common reversible adverse effects; red: drug characteristics describing less common, but potentially more serious, adverse effects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 22;159(21):2542-50 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1586-93 - PubMed
    1. Health Econ. 1998 Jun;7(4):373-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Apr;37(4):459-60 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Oct;40(10):1829-37 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms