Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Feb;166(2):1115-31.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/166.2.1115.

The effect of selection on genealogies

Affiliations

The effect of selection on genealogies

N H Barton et al. Genetics. 2004 Feb.

Abstract

The coalescent process can describe the effects of selection at linked loci only if selection is so strong that genotype frequencies evolve deterministically. Here, we develop methods proposed by Kaplan, Darden, and Hudson to find the effects of weak selection. We show that the overall effect is given by an extension to Price's equation: the change in properties such as moments of coalescence times is equal to the covariance between those properties and the fitness of the sample of genes. The distribution of coalescence times differs substantially between allelic classes, even in the absence of selection. However, the average coalescence time between randomly chosen genes is insensitive to the current allele frequency and is affected significantly by purifying selection only if deleterious mutations are common and selection is strong (i.e., the product of population size and selection coefficient, Ns>3). Balancing selection increases mean coalescence times, but the effect becomes large only when mutation rates between allelic classes are low and when selection is extremely strong. Our analysis supports previous simulations that show that selection has surprisingly little effect on genealogies. Moreover, small fluctuations in allele frequency due to random drift can greatly reduce any such effects. This will make it difficult to detect the action of selection from neutral variation alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1376-84 - PubMed
    1. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94 - PubMed
    1. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1970 Aug 1;227(5257):520-1 - PubMed
    1. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Feb;16(2):246-52 - PubMed

Publication types