Testing global memory models using ROC curves
- PMID: 1502275
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.518
Testing global memory models using ROC curves
Abstract
Global memory models are evaluated by using data from recognition memory experiments. For recognition, each of the models gives a value of familiarity as the output from matching a test item against memory. The experiments provide ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves that give information about the standard deviations of familiarity values for old and new test items in the models. The experimental results are consistent with normal distributions of familiarity (a prediction of the models). However, the results also show that the new-item familiarity standard deviation is about 0.8 that of the old-item familiarity standard deviation and independent of the strength of the old items (under the assumption of normality). The models are inconsistent with these results because they predict either nearly equal old and new standard deviations or increasing values of old standard deviation with strength. Thus, the data provide the basis for revision of current models or development of new models.
Similar articles
-
Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):763-85. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.763. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994. PMID: 8064246
-
Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.Mem Cognit. 2019 May;47(4):855-876. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00922-8. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30949925
-
Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1210-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1210. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003. PMID: 14622056 Clinical Trial.
-
Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):800-32. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800. Psychol Bull. 2007. PMID: 17723031 Review.
-
Odor memory: taking stock.Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):242-51. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.242. Psychol Bull. 1991. PMID: 2034752 Review.
Cited by
-
Modeling confidence judgments, response times, and multiple choices in decision making: recognition memory and motion discrimination.Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):697-719. doi: 10.1037/a0033152. Psychol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23915088 Free PMC article.
-
Recognition and position information in working memory for visual textures.Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):282-94. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.282. Mem Cognit. 2008. PMID: 18426061
-
Bayesian confidence in optimal decisions.Psychol Rev. 2024 Oct;131(5):1114-1160. doi: 10.1037/rev0000472. Epub 2024 Jul 18. Psychol Rev. 2024. PMID: 39023934 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using receiver operating characteristics.Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 19. Brain Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19101064 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1726-41. doi: 10.1037/a0033671. Epub 2013 Jul 8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 23834057 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources