Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):665.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38031.775845.7C. Epub 2004 Mar 15.

National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section

Jane Thomas  1 , Shantini Paranjothy, David James
Affiliations
Comparative Study

National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section

Jane Thomas et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between decision to delivery interval and maternal and baby outcomes.

Design: National cross sectional survey.

Setting: Maternity units in England and Wales. SUBJECTS REVIEWED: 17 780 singleton births (99% of all births) delivered by emergency caesarean section in England and Wales between 1 May 2000 and 31 July 2000.

Main outcome measures: Association between decision to delivery interval and baby outcomes (Apgar scores of < 7 and < 4 at five minutes and stillbirth) and maternal outcomes (requirement for special care additional to routine care after caesarean section and where care was provided).

Results: Compared with babies delivered within 15 minutes, there was no difference in maternal or baby outcome for decision to delivery interval between 16 and 75 minutes. After 75 minutes, however, there was a significantly higher odds of a five minute Apgar score of < 7 (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.4), and 50% increase in odds of special care additional to routine care for mothers.

Conclusion: A decision to delivery interval of 30 minutes is not an absolute threshold for influencing baby outcome. Decision to delivery intervals of more than 75 minutes are associated with poorer maternal and baby outcomes and should be avoided.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eddy JW. Is childbirth safe in the UK and are there enough obstetricians? Letter to a chief executive. Hosp Med 2000;61: 204-6. - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring: the use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal monitoring. No 8. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
    1. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The national sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
    1. Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Beguin EA, Schaper AM, Spindler J. Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179: 151-5. - PubMed
    1. Roemer VM, Heger-Romermann G. [Emergency cesarean section—basic data]. Zeitschrift Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1992;196: 95-9. [In German.] - PubMed

Publication types