Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Apr;239(4):433-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000120071.75691.1f.

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study

Juan A Luján  1 , M Dolores Frutos, Quiteria Hernández, Ramón Liron, Jose R Cuenca, Graciela Valero, Pascual Parrilla
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study

Juan A Luján et al. Ann Surg. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Summary background data: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly acknowledged surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually performed as an open surgery procedure, although now some groups perform it via the laparoscopic approach.

Patients and methods: Between June 1999 and January 2002 we conducted a randomized prospective study in 104 patients diagnosed with morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group with gastric bypass via the open approach (OGBP) comprising 51 patients, and 1 group with gastric bypass via the laparoscopic approach (LGBP) comprising 53 patients. The parameters compared were as follows: operating time, intraoperative complications, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) postoperative complications, hospital stay, and short-term evolution of body mass index.

Results: Mean operating time was 186.4 minutes (125-290) in the LGBP group and 201.7 minutes (129-310) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 8% of the LGBP patients. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) occurred in 22.6% of the LGBP group compared with 29.4% of the OGBP group, with no significant differences. Late complications (>30 days) occurred in 11% of the LGBP group compared with 24% of the OGBP group (P < 0.05). The differences observed between the 2 groups are the result of a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias in the OGBP group. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (1-13) in the LGBP group and 7.9 days (2-28) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Evolution of body mass index during a mean follow-up of 23 months was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: LGBP is a good surgical technique for the management of morbid obesity and has clear advantages over OGBP, such as a reduction in abdominal wall complications and a shorter hospital stay. The midterm weight loss is similar with both techniques. One inconvenience is that LGBP has a more complex learning curve than other advanced laparoscopic techniques, which may be associated with an increase in postoperative complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Evolution of the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and BMI.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–961. - PubMed
    1. Reinhold RB. Late results of gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. J Am Coll Nutr. 1994;13:326–331. - PubMed
    1. Fobi MA, Lee H, Holness R, et al. Gastric bypass operation for obesity. World J Surg. 1998;22:925–935. - PubMed
    1. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM, et al. Gastric bypass for treating severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(suppl 2):560s–566s. - PubMed
    1. Abu-Abeid S, Szold A. Results and complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding an early an intermediate experience. Obes Surg. 1999;9:188–190. - PubMed