To plug or not to plug?
- PMID: 15025762
- PMCID: PMC420040
- DOI: 10.1186/cc2829
To plug or not to plug?
Abstract
Coronary artery disease remains a common problem in industrialized countries. Percutaneous coronary interventions are usually performed utilizing the femoral approach. Arterial puncture-closing devices have been developed in hope to avoid manual compression and shortening the period of rest. In a recent meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association these devices have shown only marginal benefits over manual compression. Further, well designed studies are necessary to document the comparative effects of these devices versus manual compression.
References
-
- Smith SC, Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes D, Kern MJ, Kuntz RE, Popma JJ, Schaff HV, Williams DO, Gibbons RJ, Alpert JP, Eagle KA, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gardner TJ, Gregoratos G, Russell RO, Smith SC., Jr A report from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2215–2239. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01344-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nasser T, Mohleri EI, Wilensky R, Hathaway D. Peripheral vascular complications following coronary interventional procedures. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:609–614. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical