Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):702-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.

CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

Affiliations

CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

Marion K Campbell et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Recommended format for flow diagram of the progress of clusters and individuals through the phases of a randomised trial
Fig 2
Fig 2
Example of diagram showing flow of clusters and participants through a trial (adapted from Thomas et al38)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276: 637-9. - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357: 1191-4. - PubMed
    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134: 663-94. - PubMed
    1. Puffer S, Torgerson D, Watson J. Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 2003;327: 785-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fayers PM, Jordhøy MS, Kaasa S. Cluster-randomized trials. Palliat Med 2002;26: 69-70. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms