Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Dec;20(12):485-94.
doi: 10.1023/b:jarg.0000013648.74404.9d.

Psychogenic infertility--myths and facts

Affiliations
Review

Psychogenic infertility--myths and facts

Tewes H Wischmann. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The hypothesis of this review is that the role of psychological factors as the sole cause of infertility is generally overrated.

Methods: A review is given of studies concerning the influence of psychological factors on the development of infertility.

Result: A prevalence of psychogenic infertility of 10-15 per cent must be discussed critically. A value of approximately 5 per cent is more realistic. Equating unexplained infertility with psychogenic infertility is not justified. A definition of psychogenic infertility according to the German guidelines Psychosomatics in Reproductive Medicine is presented. Spontaneous pregnancies following adoption or the decision to remain childless are the absolute exception. The association of stress and infertility in humans is still unclear. For many women the effect of infertility and notably of medical therapy is a considerable emotional stress. This may make psychosocial counseling necessary in certain cases.

Conclusions: An exclusive psychological/psychodynamical point of view on the complexity of infertility is as inadequate as a strictly somatic point of view. Infertility should always be treated as a psychosomatic entirety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright J, Allard M, Lecours A, Sabourin S. Psychosocial distress and infertility: A review of controlled research. Int J Fertil. 1989;58:731–737. - PubMed
    1. Stanton AL, Lobel M, Sears S, DeLuca RS. Psychosocial aspects of selected issues in women's reproductive health: Current status and future directions. directions JC onsultC linP. 2002;70:751–770. - PubMed
    1. Jeker L, Micioni G, Ruspa M, Zeeb M, Campana A. Wish for a child and infertility: Study on 116 couples. I: Interview and psychodynamic hypotheses. Int J Fertil. 1988;33:411–420. - PubMed
    1. Batstra L, van de Wie HBM, Schuiling GA. Opinions about “unexplained subfertility.”. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;23:211–214. - PubMed
    1. Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C. Psychological adjustment to infertility: An overview of conceptual approaches. In: Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C, editors. Infertility Perspectives From Stress and Coping Research. New York: Plenum; 1991. pp. 3–16.