Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2003 Jul-Aug;1(2):70-8.
doi: 10.1370/afm.56.

The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Jeanne-Marie Guise  1 , Valerie Palda, Carolyn Westhoff, Benjamin K S Chan, Mark Helfand, Tracy A Lieu; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Jeanne-Marie Guise et al. Ann Fam Med. 2003 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to systematically review whether primary care-based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding.

Methods: Studies were found by searching MEDLINE (1966-2001), Health-STAR, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and bibliographies of identified trials and review articles. Studies were included if they originated in the primary care setting and were conducted in a developed country, written in English, and contained a concurrent control group.

Results: Thirty randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and 5 systematic reviews of breastfeeding counseling were included. Educational programs had the greatest effect of any single intervention on both initiation (difference 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.34) and short-term duration (difference 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50). Support programs conducted by telephone, in person, or both increased short-term (difference 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.19) and long-term duration (difference 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16). In contrast, written materials such as pamphlets did not significantly increase breastfeeding. Data were insufficient to determine whether the combination of education with support was more effective than education alone.

Conclusions: Educational programs were the most effective single intervention. One woman would breast-feed for up to 3 months for every 3 to 5 women attending breastfeeding educational programs. Future research and policy should focus on translating these findings into more widespread practice in diverse primary care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study Eligibility Flow Chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, et al. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA 2001;285(4):413–420. - PubMed
    1. Kennedy KI, Visness CM. Contraceptive efficacy of lactational amenorrhoea. Lancet 1992;339(8787):227–230. - PubMed
    1. Heinig MJ, Dewey KG. Health effects of breast feeding for mothers: a critical review. Nut Res Rev 1997;10:35–56. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://web.health.gov/healthypeople/document/html/volume2/22physical.htm. 2000. Accessed June 25, 2003.
    1. Ryan AS, Wenjun Z, Acosta A. Breastfeeding continues to increase into the new millennium. Pediatrics 2002;110(6):1103–1109. - PubMed

Publication types