Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Dec;6(4):290-7.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00225.x.

Impact of patient information booklet on treatment decision--a randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation

Sirkku Vuorma  1 , Pekka Rissanen, Anna-Mari Aalto, Ritva Hurskainen, Erkki Kujansuu, Juha Teperi
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of patient information booklet on treatment decision--a randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation

Sirkku Vuorma et al. Health Expect. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Does a patient information booklet influence treatment for menorrhagia?

Design: Randomized trial and a pre-trial prospective cohort study.

Setting: Gynaecology outpatient clinics in 14 Finnish hospitals.

Participants: A total of 363 (randomized trial) plus 206 (cohort study) patients with menorrhagia.

Intervention: An information booklet about menorrhagia and treatment options, mailed before the first visit to the outpatient clinic.

Main outcome measures: Distribution of treatment modalities, knowledge about treatment options, satisfaction with communication with personnel and anxiety.

Results: Treatment decision within 3 months was made more often in the intervention group than in the control group (96% and 89% respectively, P = 0.02). Oral medication was more frequently chosen, and newly introduced treatments (minor surgery, hormonal intrauterine system) were less frequently used in the intervention group (at 3-month follow-up 21% and 29%, respectively). The differences persisted at the 12-month follow-up. In the pre-trial group, new treatment methods were less frequently chosen and used than in the control group. Additional information did not increase the number of surgical procedures used, improve knowledge, or influence satisfaction or anxiety.

Conclusions: Additional information led to an increase in specific treatment decisions and changed the distribution of used treatments without increasing the number of surgical procedures. The study suggests that well-informed women adopting an active role may counteract physicians' emphasis on newly introduced treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systemic review. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 731–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy ADM, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A et al Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs; Journal of American Medical Association, 2002; 288: 2701–2708. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? British Medical Journal, 1999; 318: 318–322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Market Opinion and Research International, MORI. Women's Health in 1990.Research study conducted on behalf of Parke‐Davies Research Laboratories. Southampton: Market Opinion and Research International, ; 1990..
    1. Coulter A, McPherson K, Vessey M. Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? Social Science & Medicine, 1988; 27: 987–994. - PubMed

Publication types