Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Apr;98(4):891-902.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000107940.23783.33.

Inotropes improve right heart function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Inotropes improve right heart function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Andrew D Maslow et al. Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

The administration of inotropes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial. Issues include the risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic outflow obstruction (LVOTO) and the proper treatment of diastolic dysfunction for patients in whom LV systolic function is often preserved and subsequently improved. In this study, we assessed the hemodynamic benefits of inotropes for patients undergoing AVR for AS. Thirty-four patients were prospectively randomized to one of three groups: epinephrine, milrinone, or placebo. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were obtained before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Data were also obtained before and after increases in ventricular preload to assess the effects of inotropes on diastolic function. The use of inotropes was associated with significantly larger increases in right ventricular (RV) (placebo, 0.5%; epinephrine, +9%; milrinone, +8%; P < 0.01) and LV (placebo, +7%; epinephrine, +18%; milrinone, +20%; P = 0.07) ejection fractions (EF) and cardiac output after CPB. Changes in cardiac output and index were more strongly correlated with changes in RVEF (r = 0.56, P < 0.01; r = 0.47, P < 0.01, respectively) than with LVEF (r = 0.22, r = 0.08). Of all patients receiving epinephrine or milrinone, only one (1 of 22) had a decrease in RVEF, whereas 6 of 12 patients receiving placebo had a reduction in RVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. Correspondingly, for LVEF, 1 of 22 patients receiving inotropes had a decrease in LVEF, whereas 3 of 12 placebo patients had a reduction in LVEF from pre-CPB to post-CPB. No patient had evidence of LVOTO. Inotropes improved hemodynamics after AVR for AS. This was attributable more to improved RV function than to changes in LV function. Although there were no changes in diastolic function, it is possible that this study did not allow significant timing to observe benefits of inotropes on diastolic function in this setting.

Implications: Compared with placebo, both epinephrine and milrinone similarly improved biventricular performance after aortic valve replacement, with a greater impact on right ventricular function. Choice of either inotropic drug should be driven by blood pressure and hemodynamic goals in this setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McKenney PA, Apstein Cs, Mendes LA, et al. Immediate effect of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on left ventricular diastolic chamber stiffness. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 914–8.
    1. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1997; 95: 2395–400.
    1. Jin XY, Pepper JR, Brecker SJ, et al. Early changes in left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 1142–6.
    1. Villari B, Vassalli G, Monrad ES, et al. Normalization of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis late after valve replacement. Circulation 1995; 91: 2353–8.
    1. Gilchrist IC, Waxman HL, Kurnik PB. Improvement in early diastolic filling dynamics after aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1124–9.

Publication types

MeSH terms