Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):8-14.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1.

Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management

Barbara Starfield et al. Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although comorbidity is very common in the population, little is known about the types of health service that are used by people with comorbid conditions.

Methods: Data from claims on the nonelderly were classified by diagnosis and extent of comorbidity, using a case-mix measure known as the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups, to study variation in extent of comorbidity and resource utilization. Visits of patients (adults and children) with 11 conditions were classified as to whether they were to primary care physicians or to other specialists, and whether they involved the chosen condition or other conditions.

Results: Comorbidity varied within each diagnosis; resource use depended on the degree of comorbidity rather than the diagnosis. When stratified by degree of comorbidity, the number of visits for comorbid conditions exceeded the number of visits for the index condition in almost all comorbidity groups and for visits to both primary care physicians and to specialists. The number of visits to primary care physicians for both the index condition and for comorbid conditions almost invariably exceeded the number of visits to specialists. These patterns differed only for uncommon conditions in which specialists played a greater role in the care of the condition, but not for comorbid conditions.

Conclusions: In view of the high degree of comorbidity, even in a nonelderly population, single-disease management does not appear promising as a strategy to care for patients. In contrast, the burden is on primary care physicians to provide the majority of care, not only for the target condition but for other conditions. Thus, management in the context of ongoing primary care and oriented more toward patients' overall health care needs appears to be a more promising strategy than care oriented to individual diseases. New paradigms of care that acknowledge actual patterns of comorbidities as well as the need for close coordination between generalists and specialists require support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Visits to Generalist and Specialist Physicians for Adults with Hypertension
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Visits to Generalist and Specialist Physicians for Children with Diabetes

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitchell G, Del Mar C, Francis D. Does primary medical practitioner involvement with a specialist team improve patient outcomes? A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:934–939. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guralnik JM, LaCroix A, Evertt D. Aging in the eighties: the prevalence of co-morbidity and its association with disability. Washington, DC: DHHS (NCHS); 1989.
    1. Bierman AS, Clancy CM. Women’s health, chronic disease, and disease management: new words and old music? Womens Health Issues 1999;9:2–17. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung HY. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA 1996;276:1473–1479. - PubMed
    1. Roos NP, Carriere KC, Friesen D. Factors influencing the frequency of visits by hypertensive patients to primary care physicians in Winnipeg. Can Med Assoc J 1998;159:777–783. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types