Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Mar 25:4:4.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-4.

Instructions to authors for case reporting are limited: a review of a core journal list

Olanrewaju Sorinola  1 , Olufemi Olufowobi, Aravinthan Coomarasamy, Khalid S Khan
Affiliations

Instructions to authors for case reporting are limited: a review of a core journal list

Olanrewaju Sorinola et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Case reports are frequently published in the health care literature, however advice on preparing such reports using the "instructions to authors" pages of journals is alleged to be limited. However, to our knowledge, this has not been formally evaluated. As roles of case reports may vary according to the case and the clinical specialities, one might expect the advice to authors to vary according to journal clinical grouping.

Methods: We surveyed the current advice available to authors of case reports from 'instructions to authors' pages of a core collection of 249 journals ('Hague' list). These were examined and compared for advice or recommendation on writing case reports. Of these, 163 (65%) published case reports and provided instructions on this publication type. Data were extracted on items of style and content of case reports, using a piloted data extraction form.

Results: Journals that published case reports were grouped into medical (n = 81, 50%), surgical (n = 38, 23%) and generic or multidisciplinary (n = 44, 27%) categories. There was a difference among the medical, surgical and generic or multidisciplinary journals in the maximum number of words and pages allowed but no difference in the number of figures, tables, references, authors, abstract or synopsis, indexing or key words and consent. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference among the three different categories of journals regarding the content of the case reports.

Conclusions: Of the journals reviewed, we found that 'instructions to authors' pages provided limited and varied information for preparing a case report. There is a need for consensus, and more consistent guidance for authors of case report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of journals' instructions to authors on case reporting
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wright SM, Kouroukis C. Capturing zebras: what to do with a reportable case. CMAJ. 2000;163:429–431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandenbroucke JP. In defence of case reports and case series. Ann Int Med. 2001;134:330–332. - PubMed
    1. British Medical Association Medical Information Working Party . Collection of Medical Books and Journals. In: Howard Hague, editor. Core. 4 2001.
    1. Brodell RT. Do more than discuss that unusual case: Write it up. Postgrad Med. 2000;108 http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/2000/08_00/editorial.htm - PubMed
    1. Bignall J, Horton R. Learning from stories – The Lancet's case reports. Lancet. 1995;346:1246. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91859-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms