Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;65(1):18-24.
doi: 10.1007/BF01466269.

The effect of a high carbohydrate diet on running performance during a 30-km treadmill time trial

Affiliations

The effect of a high carbohydrate diet on running performance during a 30-km treadmill time trial

C Williams et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of a high carbohydrate diet on running performances during a 30-km treadmill time trial. Eighteen runners (12 men and 6 women) took part in this study and completed a 30-km time trial on a level treadmill without modifying their food intake (trial 1). The runners were then randomly assigned to a control or a carbohydrate (CHO) group. The CHO group supplemented their normal diets with additional carbohydrate in the form of confectionery products during the 7 days before trial 2; the control group matched the increased energy intake of the CHO group by consuming additional fat and protein. The mean (SEM) carbohydrate intake of both groups was 334 (22) g before trial 1, after which the CHO group consumed 566 (29) g.day-1 for the first 3 days and 452 (26) g.day-1 for the remaining 4 days of recovery. Although there was no overall difference between the performance times for the two groups during trial 2, the CHO group ran faster during the last 5 km of trial 2 than during trial 1 [3.64 (0.24) m.s-1 vs 3.44 (0.26) m.s-1; P less than 0.05]. Furthermore, the 6 men in the CHO group ran the 30 km faster after carbohydrate loading [131.0 (5.4) min vs 127.4 (4.9) min; P less than 0.05], whereas there was no such improvement in times of the men in the control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979 Sep;107(1):19-32 - PubMed
    1. Int J Sports Med. 1981 May;2(2):114-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(6):698-706 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60(2):112-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Sep;34(9):1831-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources