Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Apr;26(3):225-32.
doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(04)00004-2.

Cost effectiveness of disulfiram: treating cocaine use in methadone-maintained patients

Mireia Jofre-Bonet  1 , Jody L Sindelar, Ismene L Petrakis, Charla Nich, Tami Frankforter, Bruce J Rounsaville, Kathleen M Carroll
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cost effectiveness of disulfiram: treating cocaine use in methadone-maintained patients

Mireia Jofre-Bonet et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests that disulfiram is a promising treatment for cocaine dependence. We study the cost-effectiveness of providing disulfiram to methadone-maintained opioid addicts in a randomized clinical trial setting. Our economic evaluation is based on a double blind clinical trial in which 67 cocaine-dependent methadone-maintained opioid-dependent subjects were randomized to get the additional treatment of disulfiram or placebo in a 12-week trial. Outcome measures used are the number of days of cocaine use and grams of cocaine per week. Cost measures used are the cost of providing standard methadone treatment and the incremental cost of adding disulfiram to the standard treatment. Cost measures of standard and disulfiram-enhanced treatment were collected retrospectively from the provider. Results from this cost-effectiveness analysis imply that, even though disulfiram increases slightly the cost of methadone treatment, its increase in effectiveness may be important enough to warrant its addition for treating cocaine dependence in methadone-maintained opiate addicts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3. Washington, DC: Author; 1987. rev.
    1. Avants SK, Margolin A, Sindelar JL, Rounsaville BJ, Schottenfeld R, Stine S, Cooney NL, Rosenheck RA, Li SH, Kosten TR. Day treatment versus enhanced standard methadone services for opioid-dependent patients: a comparison of clinical efficacy and cost. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156:27–33. - PubMed
    1. Ball JC, Ross A. The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
    1. Barnett PG. The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance as a health care intervention. Addiction. 1999;94:479–488. - PubMed
    1. Barnett PG, Hui SS. The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance. Mt Sinai Journal of Medicine. 2000;67:365–374. - PubMed

Publication types