Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Apr;20(2):127-34.
doi: 10.1023/b:caim.0000014071.79826.1f.

Clinical relevance of left ventricular volumes and function assessed by gated SPECT in paediatric patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical relevance of left ventricular volumes and function assessed by gated SPECT in paediatric patients

Tarek Abdel-Fattah El-Maghraby et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) can be measured by echocardiography and gated single photon emission computed tomography (G-SPECT). The literature is rich in works on G-SPECT in adults, but lacks data for children. This work evaluates the accuracy of G-SPECT in children, compared to echocardiography.

Patients and methods: The study comprised 60 children. Eighteen with history of sickle cell disease, 5 dilated cardiomyopathy, 12 valvular heart disease and one with hyperlipidaemia. Other 24 children free from cardiac problems were included. All patients were given 185-370 MBq (5-10 mCi) of 99mTc-MIBI or 99mTc-Myoview. Resting G-SPECT was acquired 45-60 min after injection. LV volumes and EF were measured by G-SPECT and echocardiography.

Results: In all 60 cases, the correlation coefficients between both methods were 0.66 for EDV, 0.73 for ESV and 0.42 for EF. The 36 diseased children yielded fair to weak correlations for EDV, ESV and EF (r = 0.69, 0.74 and 0.41 respectively). The EDV was larger by echocardiography than G-SPECT (81.95 +/- 28.87 vs. 65.91 +/- 31.59 ml, p < 0.01). The ESV was also larger by echocardiography (39.13 +/- 15.96 vs. 23.44 +/- 18.04 ml, p < 0.01). The EF by G-SPECT (67.32 +/- 11.63%) was higher than by echocardiography (52.65 +/- 11.77%), (p < 0.01). The 24 normal subjects yielded almost the same level of weak correlation between both methods for EDV, ESV and EF (r = 0.59, 0.69, and 0.44 respectively).

Conclusion: LV volumes and EF computed by G-SPECT correlated poorly with echocardiography in small ventricles. Consequently, G-SPECT has a limited clinical usefulness in paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999 Dec;26(12 ):1533-40 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;5(5):477-83 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1999 May;40(5):810-3 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2000 Sep;41(9):1445-50 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;7(6):661-8 - PubMed