Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model
- PMID: 15068909
- DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00351-1
Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model
Abstract
Spoken language comprehension requires the coordination of different subprocesses in time. After the initial acoustic analysis the system has to extract segmental information such as phonemes, syntactic elements and lexical-semantic elements as well as suprasegmental information such as accentuation and intonational phrases, i.e., prosody. According to the dynamic dual pathway model of auditory language comprehension syntactic and semantic information are primarily processed in a left hemispheric temporo-frontal pathway including separate circuits for syntactic and semantic information whereas sentence level prosody is processed in a right hemispheric temporo-frontal pathway. The relative lateralization of these functions occurs as a result of stimulus properties and processing demands. The observed interaction between syntactic and prosodic information during auditory sentence comprehension is attributed to dynamic interactions between the two hemispheres.
Similar articles
-
Hemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody.Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):344-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.004. Neuroimage. 2004. PMID: 15325382
-
What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis.Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):577-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036. Epub 2010 Jul 23. Neuroimage. 2011. PMID: 20656040
-
Sign and speech: amodal commonality in left hemisphere dominance for comprehension of sentences.Brain. 2005 Jun;128(Pt 6):1407-17. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh465. Epub 2005 Feb 23. Brain. 2005. PMID: 15728651
-
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011. Physiol Rev. 2011. PMID: 22013214 Review.
-
Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language.Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Nov;9(11):512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Oct 7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005. PMID: 16214387 Review.
Cited by
-
ERP differences between processing of physical characteristics and personality attributes.Behav Brain Funct. 2012 Sep 11;8:49. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-49. Behav Brain Funct. 2012. PMID: 22967478 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stable modality-specific activity flows as reflected by the neuroenergetic approach to the FMRI weighted maps.PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033462. Epub 2012 Mar 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22432026 Free PMC article.
-
Human neuromagnetic steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones, speech, and music.Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):461-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000033. Ear Hear. 2014. PMID: 24603544 Free PMC article.
-
Cortical pitch response components show differential sensitivity to native and nonnative pitch contours.Brain Lang. 2014 Nov;138:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Oct 10. Brain Lang. 2014. PMID: 25306506 Free PMC article.
-
Developmental malformation of the corpus callosum: a review of typical callosal development and examples of developmental disorders with callosal involvement.J Neurodev Disord. 2011 Mar;3(1):3-27. doi: 10.1007/s11689-010-9059-y. Epub 2010 Sep 23. J Neurodev Disord. 2011. PMID: 21484594 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources