Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Apr;125(4):1400-5.
doi: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1400.

Efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in medically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Jesús Sancho  1 , Emilio Servera, Juan Díaz, Julio Marín
Affiliations

Efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in medically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Jesús Sancho et al. Chest. 2004 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To determine under what circumstances the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) can generate clinically effective expiratory flows for airway clearance (> 2.7 L/s) for clinically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Materials and method: Twenty-six consecutive patients with ALS were studied, 15 with severe bulbar dysfunction. Using a pneumotachograph and with the aid of an oronasal mask, we measured FVC, FEV(1), peak cough flow (PCF), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), PCF generated from a maximum insufflation MIC (PCFMIC), and PCF generated by MI-E (PCFMI-E). MI-E was delivered at +/- 40 cm H(2)O. Maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax) at the mouth were also measured.

Results: Although both groups had a similar time from ALS symptom onset to diagnosis, statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found between nonbulbar and bulbar patients in lung function and cough capacity parameters: FVC, 2.58 +/- 1.24 L vs 1.62 +/- 0.74 L; FEV(1), 2.26 +/- 1.18 L vs 1.54 +/- 0.69 L; PImax, - 93.45 +/- 47.47 cm H(2)O vs - 3.64 +/- 25.07 cm H(2)O; PEmax, 140.45 +/- 75.98 cm H(2)O vs 69.93 +/- 32.14 cm H(2)O; MIC, 3.02 +/- 1.22 L vs 1.97 +/- 0.75 L; PCF, 5.91 +/- 2.55 L/s vs 3.42 +/- 1.44 L/s; PCFMIC, 6.68 +/- 2.71 L/s vs 4.00 +/- 1.48 L/s; and PCFMI-E, 4.34 +/- 0.82 L/s vs 3.35 +/- 0.77 L/s. Four patients with bulbar dysfunction and MIC > 1 L had PCFMI-E < 2.7 L/s. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed PCFMIC of <or= 2.7 L/s predicting those patients with PCFMI-E < 2.7 L/s. The ROC curve analysis showed PCFMIC > 4 L/s predicting those patients with PCFMIC greater than PCFMI-E.

Conclusion: MI-E is able to generate clinically effective PCFMI-E (> 2.7 L/s) for stable patients with ALS, except for those with bulbar dysfunction who also have a MIC > 1 L and PCFMIC <2.7 L/s who probably have severe dynamic collapse of the upper airways during the exsufflation cycle. Clinically stable patients with mild respiratory dysfunction and PCFMIC > 4 L/s might not benefit from MI-E except during an acute respiratory illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in