Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 May-Jun;39(3):247-50.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh044.

Variation in AUDIT (Alcohol Use [correction of Used] Disorder Identification Test) scores within the first weeks of imprisonment

Brigitte Maggia  1 , Sandrine Martin, Corinne Crouzet, Pascal Richard, Pierre Wagner, Jean-Louis Balmès, Bertrand Nalpas
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Variation in AUDIT (Alcohol Use [correction of Used] Disorder Identification Test) scores within the first weeks of imprisonment

Brigitte Maggia et al. Alcohol Alcohol. 2004 May-Jun.

Abstract

Aims: Although the prevalence of alcohol problems amongst detainees is suspected to be high, often only more flagrant problems are detected, restricting the possibilities for intervention in alcohol misuse and reducing opportunities for preventive efforts. This study examined the re-test reliability of AUDIT (the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test) in screening prisoners

Methods: AUDIT was administered for the first time on the day of entry to prison and again about 15 days later. The results were analysed according to two AUDIT thresholds: a score of 8 or higher and 12 or higher.

Results: Of 75 consecutive entrants tested, 47 male prisoners completed the study. At the first administration, 19.1% of these 47 men met criteria for a probable alcohol problem but this percentage rose to 59.6% on the second occasion (P = 0.0001). The proportion of subjects with a score 12 or higher (probably dependent) was 10.6% the first time versus 42.6% the second time (P = 0.0001). In the 19 who scored positive at the second administration only, changes in answers to the 10 items were coherent with a total score growing from 3.0 to 18.1 (P = 0.0001). No prisoner had a lower AUDIT score on the second administration. As alcohol problems are not routinely considered during the medical and biological examination at entry, no confirmation of the AUDIT results could be obtained, although those obtained at the second administration fitted well with the prevalence rates in previous reports.

Conclusions: AUDIT, for the purpose of giving a prevalence estimate or to enter appropriate prisoners into more detailed assessment or interventions, should not be conducted immediately at entry, but some weeks later.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
DISTRIBUTION OF AUDIT SCORES AT FIRST AND SECOND ADMINISTRATIONS.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J, Grant M. WHO Publication No. 92.4. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1992. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary health care.
    1. Batel P, Tkoub EM, Pessione F, Lancrenon S. Essai d’évaluation des attitudes de déni en clinique alcoologique. Alcoologie. 1999;21 :35–42.
    1. Bradley KA, McDonell MB, Bush K, Kivlahan DR, Diehr P, Fihn SD. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions : reliability, validity and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22 :1842–9. - PubMed
    1. Brooke D, Taylor C, Gunn J, Maden A. Substance misusers remanded to prison - a treatment opportunity? Addiction. 1998;93 :1851–6. - PubMed
    1. Conigrave KM, Hall WD, Saunders JB. The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. Addiction. 1995;90 :1349–56. - PubMed

Publication types