Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 May;239(5):660-7; discussion 667-70.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000124298.74199.e5.

Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial of a bioartificial liver in treating acute liver failure

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial of a bioartificial liver in treating acute liver failure

Achilles A Demetriou et al. Ann Surg. 2004 May.

Abstract

Objective: The HepatAssist liver support system is an extracorporeal porcine hepatocyte-based bioartificial liver (BAL). The safety and efficacy of the BAL were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in patients with severe acute liver failure.

Summary background data: In experimental animals with acute liver failure, we demonstrated beneficial effects of the BAL. Similarly, Phase I trials of the BAL in acute liver failure patients yielded promising results.

Methods: A total of 171 patients (86 control and 85 BAL) were enrolled. Patients with fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure and primary nonfunction following liver transplantation were included. Data were analyzed with and without accounting for the following confounding factors: liver transplantation, time to transplant, disease etiology, disease severity, and treatment site.

Results: For the entire patient population, survival at 30 days was 71% for BAL versus 62% for control (P = 0.26). After exclusion of primary nonfunction patients, survival was 73% for BAL versus 59% for control (n = 147; P = 0.12). When survival was analyzed accounting for confounding factors, in the entire patient population, there was no difference between the 2 groups (risk ratio = 0.67; P = 0.13). However, survival in fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure patients was significantly higher in the BAL compared with the control group (risk ratio = 0.56; P = 0.048).

Conclusions: This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an extracorporeal liver support system, demonstrating safety and improved survival in patients with fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Schematic outline of the BAL and the bioreactor cartridge loaded with microcarrier-attached porcine hepatocytes.
None
FIGURE 2.A: Time to death in FHF/SHF patients (n = 147; P = 0.10). B: Time to death in patients with FHF/SHF of known etiology (n = 83; P = 0.009).
None
FIGURE 3. Total serum bilirubin levels (mean ± SD).

References

    1. Kondrup J, Almdal T, Vilstrup H, et al. High volume plasma exchange in fulminant hepatic failure. Int J Artif Organs. 1992;15:669–676. - PubMed
    1. Awad SS, Swaniker F, Magee J, et al. Results of a phase I trial evaluating a liver support device utilizing albumin dialysis. Surgery. 2001;130:354–362. - PubMed
    1. Horslen SP, Hammel JM, Fristoe LW, et al. Extracorporeal liver perfusion using human and pig livers for acute liver failure. Transplantation. 2000;70:1472–1478. - PubMed
    1. Ellis AJ, Hughes RD, Wendon JA, et al. Pilot-controlled trial of the extracorporeal liver assist device in acute liver failure. Hepatology. 1996;24:1446–1451. - PubMed
    1. Mullon C, Pitkin Z. The HepatAssist® Bioartificial Liver Support System: clinical study and pig hepatocyte process. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 1999;8:229–235. - PubMed